dobre_shunka
A Verified Danny White Plant
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 4,844
- Likes
- 9,914
This year's committee has 1 member with SEC connections (UK AD) while 4 have Big10 connections (Michigan AD, 2 former players and a graduate).
No way a 2nd SEC team gets in regardless who it is
If Bryce Young was lost for the season and Hooker was healthy I would fully expect UT to be ranked ahead of Bama. Just sayin....Here’s the list of the members. Kentucky AD is the SEC representative. But I think he must recuse himself when his conference is discussed.
College Football Playoff Selection Committee Prepares for 2022-23 Season - College Football Playoff
I think it’s pretty well a given that these will be the first five announced on this Tuesday night.
1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. TCU
4. USC
5. OSU
The only real controversy is 6 vs 7. Which will be either 10-2 Tennessee or 10-2 Bama.
The best argument for us is the head to head win and the rout at LSU who beat Bama.
The best argument for them is that their two losses were so narrow and that Tennessee was blown out in both losses.
The additional argument against us is losing our starting QB to injury.
i think the only fair thing to do is to have each member tell the public how they voted and why.
However, I know there is no way that this will happen. The head of the committee will just say they think Bama is CURRENTLY the better team and that is more important than head to head.
Of course, none of it matters if USC beats Utah and TCU beats KState.
But both of those games will be quite interesting and it wouldn’t shock me if Utah and KState both win.
Not any more. The entire Big 10 just hates them with a passion. Obviously, Saban has cheated for over a decade.
If it gets down to us versus bammer, it will be close. I think we win a close one. Vote count something like 52-49.
Don't lose to an average USCe squad and there are no worries. Alabama is probably better than Tennessee now, unfortunately. Tennessee is on the outside looking in with nobody to blame but themselves.
This year's committee has 1 member with SEC connections (UK AD) while 4 have Big10 connections (Michigan AD, 2 former players and a graduate).
No way a 2nd SEC team gets in regardless who it is
we did give up 63 to SC. Lets be real, we gave up 63 with a defense without its best player and captain. we also lost turnage real early in the game, one of our best players. we also were missing approx 5 other defensive players. MIssing your team captain an leader on defense was devastating. Look at the difference (even despite still short several players) between SC and Vandy. Our defense was much better against vandy. And lets face it, noone was going to beat SC that night the way Rattliff played. I went back and watched the replay and on several plays his throws were precise .
Yes! It will be knotted at 49-49. Then we will knock thru a 3-baller avoiding overtime.
If Bryce Young was lost for the season and Hooker was healthy I would fully expect UT to be ranked ahead of Bama. Just sayin....
Lol. Step back from the orange booze buddy. Without Hooker, this team is not nearly as good as the one that beat Bama.We would kick bammer's azz any time, any place. Their defense is horrible.
They have a pervert as an OC. He spends all week trying to find Deshawn Watson a good massage place in Cleveland.
Bama has zero quality wins this year. No good.
Here’s the list of the members. Kentucky AD is the SEC representative. But I think he must recuse himself when his conference is discussed.
College Football Playoff Selection Committee Prepares for 2022-23 Season - College Football Playoff
I think it’s pretty well a given that these will be the first five announced on this Tuesday night.
1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. TCU
4. USC
5. OSU
The only real controversy is 6 vs 7. Which will be either 10-2 Tennessee or 10-2 Bama.
The best argument for us is the head to head win and the rout at LSU who beat Bama.
The best argument for them is that their two losses were so narrow and that Tennessee was blown out in both losses.
The additional argument against us is losing our starting QB to injury.
i think the only fair thing to do is to have each member tell the public how they voted and why.
However, I know there is no way that this will happen. The head of the committee will just say they think Bama is CURRENTLY the better team and that is more important than head to head.
Of course, none of it matters if USC beats Utah and TCU beats KState.
But both of those games will be quite interesting and it wouldn’t shock me if Utah and KState both win.
saw this yesterdayHere’s the list of the members. Kentucky AD is the SEC representative. But I think he must recuse himself when his conference is discussed.
College Football Playoff Selection Committee Prepares for 2022-23 Season - College Football Playoff
I think it’s pretty well a given that these will be the first five announced on this Tuesday night.
1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. TCU
4. USC
5. OSU
The only real controversy is 6 vs 7. Which will be either 10-2 Tennessee or 10-2 Bama.
The best argument for us is the head to head win and the rout at LSU who beat Bama.
The best argument for them is that their two losses were so narrow and that Tennessee was blown out in both losses.
The additional argument against us is losing our starting QB to injury.
i think the only fair thing to do is to have each member tell the public how they voted and why.
However, I know there is no way that this will happen. The head of the committee will just say they think Bama is CURRENTLY the better team and that is more important than head to head.
Of course, none of it matters if USC beats Utah and TCU beats KState.
But both of those games will be quite interesting and it wouldn’t shock me if Utah and KState both win.
saw this yesterday
View attachment 519209