China's contempt for America

#51
#51
china's threats are becoming more aggressive
They are itching to fight us. Sadly, theyll win. We're to busy getting trannies free surgery and teaching white they're racist living in a racist country.

Too bad we didn't deal with China long ago. Now the odds are getting worse for us daily. Hopefully the woke generation will appreciate the can that was kicked down the road by their earlier peers who believed in peace and love. Sadly our affair with globalism, China style, is funding China's means to destroy us.
 
#53
#53
Extremely Ominous Warning About China From US Strategic Command Chief

Major conflict with China “is coming,” U.S. Strategic Command's chief warns outright.


Extremely Ominous Warning About China From US Strategic Command Chief
More fearmongering...

R.d961dafd40ed27c3d262ba40315e5c3d


OIP.lbpo3s1hE58ju6gt08uxjwHaFj
 
  • Like
Reactions: DEFENDTHISHOUSE
#56
#56
#57
#57
Now wait a minute... when the CIA was funding their Central American projects on drug sales in inner city America in the 1980s, there was no outrage. But now that the target is middle and lower clas white people... now it is a major concern.
I think if more people had been aware, there would have been outrage. People didn’t start to understand how bad the CIA was until recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Vol737
#58
#58
Now wait a minute... when the CIA was funding their Central American projects on drug sales in inner city America in the 1980s, there was no outrage. But now that the target is middle and lower clas white people... now it is a major concern.

To be fair, that was during a time of basic nightly news and the advent of CNN, not the 24/7 news and info we’re accustomed to now, not to mention the shear number of alternative sources willing to go down those rabbit holes now. It was much easier for the govt to cover it up with only a few complicit lackeys in the media.
 
#59
#59
Now wait a minute... when the CIA was funding their Central American projects on drug sales in inner city America in the 1980s, there was no outrage. But now that the target is middle and lower clas white people... now it is a major concern.

Big difference in the media and the government now. Harder to hide .

Joe Biden was outraged .

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

"Biden reveled in the politics of the 1994 law, bragging after it passed that “the liberal wing of the Democratic Party” was now for “60 new death penalties,” “70 enhanced penalties,” “100,000 cops,” and “125,000 new state prison cells.”

"Biden referred to the 1994 crime law as the “Biden Crime Law” and bragged that it encouraged states to effectively increase their prison sentences by paying them to build more prisons."

  • Comprehensive Control Act: This 1984 law, spearheaded by Biden and Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC), expanded federal drug trafficking penalties and civil asset forfeiture, which allows police to seize and absorb someone’s property — whether cash, cars, guns, or something else — without proving the person is guilty of a crime.
  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986: This law, sponsored and partly written by Biden, ratcheted up penalties for drug crimes. It also created a big sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine; even though the drugs are pharmacologically similar, the law made it so someone would need to possess 100 times the amount of powder cocaine to be eligible for the same mandatory minimum sentence for crack. Since crack is more commonly used by Black Americans, this sentencing disparity helped fuel big racial disparities in incarceration.
  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988: This law, co-sponsored by Biden, increased prison sentences for drug possession, enhanced penalties for transporting drugs, and established the Office of National Drug Control Policy, which coordinates and leads federal anti-drug efforts.
He treated the issue as a political move then and is doing so now with fentanyl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and EasternVol
#60
#60
Big difference in the media and the government now. Harder to hide .

Joe Biden was outraged .

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

"Biden reveled in the politics of the 1994 law, bragging after it passed that “the liberal wing of the Democratic Party” was now for “60 new death penalties,” “70 enhanced penalties,” “100,000 cops,” and “125,000 new state prison cells.”

"Biden referred to the 1994 crime law as the “Biden Crime Law” and bragged that it encouraged states to effectively increase their prison sentences by paying them to build more prisons."

  • Comprehensive Control Act: This 1984 law, spearheaded by Biden and Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC), expanded federal drug trafficking penalties and civil asset forfeiture, which allows police to seize and absorb someone’s property — whether cash, cars, guns, or something else — without proving the person is guilty of a crime.
  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986: This law, sponsored and partly written by Biden, ratcheted up penalties for drug crimes. It also created a big sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine; even though the drugs are pharmacologically similar, the law made it so someone would need to possess 100 times the amount of powder cocaine to be eligible for the same mandatory minimum sentence for crack. Since crack is more commonly used by Black Americans, this sentencing disparity helped fuel big racial disparities in incarceration.
  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988: This law, co-sponsored by Biden, increased prison sentences for drug possession, enhanced penalties for transporting drugs, and established the Office of National Drug Control Policy, which coordinates and leads federal anti-drug efforts.
He treated the issue as a political move then and is doing so now with fentanyl.
He treats everything as a political move, the good of the country be damned. He's done that forever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and rekinhavoc

VN Store



Back
Top