theFallGuy
BBQ Sketti and IPAs
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 75,456
- Likes
- 74,290
On a serious note, reading a handful of comments, doesn't really tell you anything about an entire group of people. It only gives you insight into the people who are making the comments.I never read any posts like that so I can't comment
They called Obama nice? Sounds really pleasant. Save that polite crap for the Obama thread.
Who are you calling a rightist?It's not crap, you rightists are just as much, and often more so, as bigoted as so-called liberal rightists. The only difference is, most of you don't deny it.
5 Times Republicans Called Michelle Obama A Primate
Hogg has been asking progressives follow-up questions about their assertions. Truefan may have been on of them. They almost never seem to be able to answer the follow-up.
Because history shows you guys will deny the authenticity and damn the evidence, and/or reroute the topic off into some irrelevant course. After repeated exposure to this tactic over time, some of us got wise and adopted a "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me." You can't trust a Trumpuppet or Republiar. Case in point, the SCOTUS candidates who outright lied about them being against removing Wade vs. Roe, then proceeded to remove it upon fraudulently obtain their judicial seat. One just cannot trust you things. So why bother proving assertions, knowing you will repeat the same behavior?
Now, proceed to throw your poison darts, I've been inoculated against them. And that without the services of the Liarindent.
Coronavirus: Arizona man dies, wife ill after taking drug touted by Trump - CBS News
Because history shows you guys will deny the authenticity and damn the evidence, and/or reroute the topic off into some irrelevant course. After repeated exposure to this tactic over time, some of us got wise and adopted a "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me." You can't trust a Trumpuppet or Republiar. Case in point, the SCOTUS candidates who outright lied about them being against removing Wade vs. Roe, then proceeded to remove it upon fraudulently obtain their judicial seat. One just cannot trust you things. So why bother proving assertions, knowing you will repeat the same behavior?
Now, proceed to throw your poison darts, I've been inoculated against them. And that without the services of the Liarindent.
Coronavirus: Arizona man dies, wife ill after taking drug touted by Trump - CBS News
Hogg has been asking progressives follow-up questions about their assertions. Truefan may have been on of them. They almost never seem to be able to answer the follow-up.
Is this the case where the woman was charged with murdering her husband? If so. I never saw the outcome. And I'm not sufficiently interest to Google it.
A GOP congresswoman said the end of Roe is a 'historic victory for white life'
Republicans. Nothing to see here.
Hog did ask me a follow up the other day and I answered it. It wasn't a "progressive" topic though. It was about an opinion of owner/ operatorsHog has been asking progressives follow-up questions about their assertions. Truefan may have been on of them. They almost never seem to be able to answer the follow-up.