Clarence Thomas

... but I'm not wrong. A cult must have a leader, and cult followers believe only what the cult leader wants them to believe. Those beliefs do not define inclusion into the cult. A cult is defined by loyalty and devotion towards the cult leader, first and foremost. Then ... it is obedience to the cult leader's beliefs. The leader is served first.
Read the definition as many times as you need too.
You’re wrong.
 
The democrat party to me is more like a religious cult. They have leaders who are always going to be the face of the party. Like Obama and their current man Joe Biden. However, their followers are more controlled by the organization and ideology itself and will follow it regardless. They could come out tomorrow and openly be the anti-working class party and people like BB85 will go right along with them on it.
The Democratic Party is based on a progressive ideology. It does not matter who the leaders of the party are. Therefore, it is not a cult.
 
The cult of Orphism is believed to originate in 600 BCE. The are existing members of the cult today.
No leader. No consensus on an original leader. just ideas and beliefs.

guess who has a minor in this stuff.
 
The Democratic Party is based on a progressive ideology. It does not matter who the leaders of the party are. Therefore, it is not a cult.
I thought there were moderates in the democrat party also?

Yes it is a cult based upon the standard definitions I have provided. Your party does also have constant leadership that you follow as well. Everything you have said in this forum can also be found in your religious sermons and scriptures from such places as CNN and NY Times.

Democrat Party = CULT
 
BTW. Slice may be a contractor but has multiple degrees from the glorious university of Tennessee.
 
Your explanation is inaccurate. Cults do not require a leader. You’re wrong
He has been proven wrong multiple times. He does not want to admit that his party can be classified very easily as a cult based upon definitions provided. Very stubborn indeed.
 
Ben Carson was actually ahead in the polls at one time. I believe a few days after that poll it seemed to be wall to wall coverage of Trump from that point on.
I remember it well. The left was getting the biggest kick out of it. It was inconceivable to most that there would ever be enough people to actually take him seriously, and like him if they did happen to take him seriously. It's still the most horribly bizarre thing I have witnessed.
 
I thought there were moderates in the democrat party also?

Yes it is a cult based upon the standard definitions I have provided. Your party does also have constant leadership that you follow as well. Everything you have said in this forum can also be found in your religious sermons and scriptures from such places as CNN and NY Times.

Democrat Party = CULT
Membership in the Democratic Party revolves around ideas. It is the antithesis of the cult of personality that the Republican Party has devolved into. You have not provided a source that says a cult doesn't need a leader - there isn't one. The Republican Party has nothing to do with ideas right now. It only has to do with Trump = CULT.
 
The definition of a cult clearly states that a leader isn’t required.
I’ve even provided an example of an actual cult with no known leader. At this point in leaving the willfully ignorant in his ignorant state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
He has been proven wrong multiple times. He does not want to admit that his party can be classified very easily as a cult based upon definitions provided. Very stubborn indeed.
You haven't proven $hit. You never do. You're playing the same game he is... just say you're right and the other poster is wrong enough times, and a Jedi mind trick will kick in... or something like that.
 
You don’t need a leader.
Your cultists behavior is tied to the idea of the utopian Democrat party
A cult (by most definitions, including mine) requires a cult leader. I have no cult leader so ipso facto, I'm not in a cult.

If you define a cult differently than most, so be it.
By your definition, I'm certainly a cult of one obsessively attached to my own ideology.
 
A cult (by most definitions, including mine) requires a cult leader. I have no cult leader so ipso facto, I'm not in a cult.

If you define a cult differently than most, so be it.
By your definition, I'm certainly a cult of one obsessively attached to my own ideology.
The accepted text book definition of a cult does not require a leader.

That’s it, I’m not talking about this any longer with the willfully ignorant
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
You really don't need a singular leader, but if you want to take this back to the beginning, the Democratic Party was formed in 1828 by the supporters of Andrew Jackson. So there you go. The first leader of your cult was Andrew Jackson.
 
The definition of a cult clearly states that a leader isn’t required.
I’ve even provided an example of an actual cult with no known leader. At this point in leaving the willfully ignorant in his ignorant state.
No such definition has been provided, because it doesn't exist. It isn't a cult if it doesn't have a leader. At this point, you are doing nothing more than repeating yourself ... and you were wrong the first time.
 
You really don't need a singular leader, but if you want to take this back to the beginning, the Democratic Party was formed in 1828 by the supporters of Andrew Jackson. So there you go. The first leader of your cult was Andrew Jackson.
Yes, you do.
 

VN Store



Back
Top