Nothing that he posted contradicts my source. You don't have a cult without a powerful, charismatic leader. Period.
... and it's not the leader's ideas which are followed. It's the leader himself.
As for the part I placed in bold? You are projecting your own ignorance onto people who disagree with you. You don't post links to sources that confirm your drivel, because they don't exist.
Membership in the Democratic Party is based on having a progressive ideology. It does not matter who the party leadership is. Therefore, it's not a cult.So your claim is because the democrat party are led by babboons then it's not a cult? I agree it's a band of misfits with little principles but the number of rampant nutcases is like we've never seen.
I do not normally post links because I am capable of thinking for myself. But I will go ahead and entertain you and others for the time being.Nothing that he posted contradicts my source. You don't have a cult without a powerful, charismatic leader. Period.
... and it's not the leader's ideas which are followed. It's the leader himself.
As for the part I placed in bold? You are projecting your own ignorance onto people who disagree with you. You don't post links to sources that confirm your drivel, because they don't exist.
You’re wrong.1) In case you haven't noticed, I'm not relying on my own knowledge of this subject matter. I have posted a link to a source. All I'm doing is quoting this source verbatim. If anything is inaccurate ... then it's not me, it's the source.... but that source isn't wrong. You just want to "win". It's stubborn and childish.
2) Your debating skills need some fine tuning. You don't win arguments by doing nothing more than saying, "I know more than you. Therefore, I'm right and you're wrong." That's 3rd grade level.
Yes .... and that proves that I'm right. It clearly states that a cult involves a leader who is not accountable to anyone from within the group.
You need to work on your reading comprehension.Yes .... and that proves that I'm right. It clearly states that a cult involves a leader who is not accountable to anyone from within the group.
That confirms 2 critical points of mine :
1) A cult must have a leader.
2) Support for said=leader must be unconditional. This leader in question is never held responsible for misdeeds from within the group.
I'm surprised that you posted this .... Maybe you are turning a corner here? Good for you!
BB85 is comical. Awhile back when we were having this discussion he even claimed it was devotion to a charismatic leader or ideology. Once I pointed out that the definition can be applied to the democrat party because of its ideology he immediately backtracked. Now he is backtracking again because a strong argument and case has been made that his political party is a cult.You need to work on your reading comprehension.
I'm not surprised your incapable of logic, or admitting when you're wrong.
Honestly, I think you must be some kin to luther.
Yes ... but you don't have a cult without a leader, and ideas only matter if the leader says so.Once again the actual definition of a cult.