Clarence Thomas

Arguing with cultists is pointless because you can't get past their indoctrination.
 
Nothing that he posted contradicts my source. You don't have a cult without a powerful, charismatic leader. Period.

... and it's not the leader's ideas which are followed. It's the leader himself.

As for the part I placed in bold? You are projecting your own ignorance onto people who disagree with you. You don't post links to sources that confirm your drivel, because they don't exist.

So your claim is because the democrat party are led by babboons then it's not a cult? I agree it's a band of misfits with little principles but the number of rampant nutcases is like we've never seen.

Your arguments grow more and more desperate.
 
Arguing with cultists is pointless because you can't get past their indoctrination.
Arguing with you is pointless, because you never know what you're talking about, and you can't admit when you are wrong... The problem, always lies with the other person, and their audacity to disagree with you.
 
So your claim is because the democrat party are led by babboons then it's not a cult? I agree it's a band of misfits with little principles but the number of rampant nutcases is like we've never seen.
Membership in the Democratic Party is based on having a progressive ideology. It does not matter who the party leadership is. Therefore, it's not a cult.

Membership in the Republican Party is based on having an unconditional level of devotion towards Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with conservative ideology, or policies anymore. Therefore, it is a cult.
 
Arguing with you is pointless, because you never know what you're talking about, and you can't admit when you are wrong... The problem, always lies with the other person, and their audacity to disagree with you.
Hello Pot, I'm Kettle.
 
Nothing that he posted contradicts my source. You don't have a cult without a powerful, charismatic leader. Period.

... and it's not the leader's ideas which are followed. It's the leader himself.

As for the part I placed in bold? You are projecting your own ignorance onto people who disagree with you. You don't post links to sources that confirm your drivel, because they don't exist.
I do not normally post links because I am capable of thinking for myself. But I will go ahead and entertain you and others for the time being.

Per this article below - "A cult is a group or movement held together by a shared commitment to a charismatic leader or ideology." This is also from a newspaper here in this state. Guess you better be contacting the editor tomorrow morning.

What makes a cult a cult?

Per Webster's dictionary: "great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (such as a film or book)"

Definition of CULT

And I will finish this off by posting what Rose McGowan said not too long ago. You are not going to like what she has to say for sure but it is valid.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
1) In case you haven't noticed, I'm not relying on my own knowledge of this subject matter. I have posted a link to a source. All I'm doing is quoting this source verbatim. If anything is inaccurate ... then it's not me, it's the source.... but that source isn't wrong. You just want to "win". It's stubborn and childish.

2) Your debating skills need some fine tuning. You don't win arguments by doing nothing more than saying, "I know more than you. Therefore, I'm right and you're wrong." That's 3rd grade level.
You’re wrong.
 
Yes .... and that proves that I'm right. It clearly states that a cult involves a leader who is not accountable to anyone from within the group.

That confirms 2 critical points of mine :

1) A cult must have a leader.

2) Support for said=leader must be unconditional. This leader in question is never held responsible for misdeeds from within the group.

I'm surprised that you posted this .... Maybe you are turning a corner here? Good for you!
 
Yes .... and that proves that I'm right. It clearly states that a cult involves a leader who is not accountable to anyone from within the group.

That confirms 2 critical points of mine :

1) A cult must have a leader.

2) Support for said=leader must be unconditional. This leader in question is never held responsible for misdeeds from within the group.

I'm surprised that you posted this .... Maybe you are turning a corner here? Good for you!
You need to work on your reading comprehension.

I'm not surprised your incapable of logic, or admitting when you're wrong.

Honestly, I think you must be some kin to luther.
 
You need to work on your reading comprehension.

I'm not surprised your incapable of logic, or admitting when you're wrong.

Honestly, I think you must be some kin to luther.
It’s amazing that this is still going on.
 
You need to work on your reading comprehension.

I'm not surprised your incapable of logic, or admitting when you're wrong.

Honestly, I think you must be some kin to luther.
BB85 is comical. Awhile back when we were having this discussion he even claimed it was devotion to a charismatic leader or ideology. Once I pointed out that the definition can be applied to the democrat party because of its ideology he immediately backtracked. Now he is backtracking again because a strong argument and case has been made that his political party is a cult.
 
Once again the actual definition of a cult.
Yes ... but you don't have a cult without a leader, and ideas only matter if the leader says so.

The Republican Party perfectly exemplifies this right now. Due to the unconditional support that Republicans must have for Donald Trump, the idea that the 2020 Presidential Election was rigged is part of the litmus test for membership. You are considered to be a RINO like Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, if you take the position that the 2020 Presidential Election was fair. However, such an idea matters, only because Trump says it matters. Membership to the Republican Party does not involve conservative ideals anymore. If it did, then there would be no question that Brian Kemp is a Republican .... but he's not. He is a RINO.
 
He's never going to see the truth. He's too devoted to the Democrat ideology to see past it.
It’s almost as bad with a couple of republicans I know but there are a couple of team democrats here that are just special
 
But...but... the other side.


It's both sides. Anyone being honest with themselves can see it. Both parties are clearly about control. The fact you can only blame one side really just demonstrates the point.
 
I love he how is completely ignoring my response now LMAO. Guess he has been proven wrong and will not admit it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top