Clemson post-mortem article... interesting

#51
#51
Those guys have no clue what offensive struggles are and they have been spoiled the last decade.

See: Guarantano, Jarrett as proof of what a frustrating offense looks like.

I heard JG has a couple years of super duper secret senior years of eligibility, and wants to come back to beat out Nico.
 
#53
#53
I know this is rainbows and unicorns type thinking, that some (or most) of you may think I'm nuts, but if it were possible to have Jeremy Pruitt as defensive coordinator and developing that side of the ball, the Vols would be shoo-in for CFP semi-finals and annual contender for the final.

For all his faults, the man can coach defense.
Name fits?
 
#54
#54
I know this is rainbows and unicorns type thinking, that some (or most) of you may think I'm nuts, but if it were possible to have Jeremy Pruitt as defensive coordinator and developing that side of the ball, the Vols would be shoo-in for CFP semi-finals and annual contender for the final.

For all his faults, the man can coach defense.

Will Muschamp Jr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#57
#57
Clemson needs more pieces, but honestly they don't require as many more pieces as you might think.

Dabo won 2 national titles and played for 2 others by having elite players at 3 positions/position groups: QB, WR, and D-line. They actually were pretty average along the O-line, at LB, and in the secondary. It actually surprised me how consistently successful they were without an elite O-line, and goes to show just how dynamic Watson/Lawrence and their WRs were.
 
#58
#58
Those guys have no clue what offensive struggles are and they have been spoiled the last decade.

See: Guarantano, Jarrett as proof of what a frustrating offense looks like.

There isn’t a defensive coordinator in the entire country who could stop the Vols as effectively as Jarrett Guarantano.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeMiltonsAgent
#61
#61
Clemson issues to me:

1. average WRs
2. OL not that good
3. Conditioning: In the 4th Quarter our Defense had over 100 snaps and it was Clemson Offense and Defense that was tuckered out.
4. Offensive schema/play calling.
5. Young inexperienced QB and putting too much pressure on him to carry the team.
I've been impressed with how our team does in this regard. I like to believe that the conditioning program they got going on is one of the components that has helped them to essentially play 4 full quarters of football every single game under Heupel.
 
#63
#63
Let’s keep beating FU for awhile too.

Those jort wearing wife beaters need to be knocked down a few more pegs.
 
#64
#64
They’re not fools. They see no explosive plays or players from their team.
 
#65
#65
Clemson issues to me:

1. average WRs
2. OL not that good
3. Conditioning: In the 4th Quarter our Defense had over 100 snaps and it was Clemson Offense and Defense that was tuckered out.
4. Offensive schema/play calling.
5. Young inexperienced QB and putting too much pressure on him to carry the team.


I suppose I left out the most obvious issue: Red Zone Offense!

Tennessee was pretty darn good with Red Zone Offense and Red Zone Defense this year. The exception being 19 November Red Zone Defense!
 

VN Store



Back
Top