Clemson/Syracuse

#6
#6
They’re having some trouble with Syracuse’s QB’s mobility (Wake’s Hartman gave them some trouble in that regard, also, during their game).

The biggest difference in this game is Syracuse having that 90 yard fumble return.
 
#12
#12
headhunter15 said:
Underrated move was Babers getting Robert Anae as OC.
Click to expand...

The emergence of Sophomore RB Tucker also makes a big difference. Shrader’s mobility and passing abilities have always been a part of their offensive focus, but it’s one thing to respect mobility when the QB is the only threat and it’s another with a RB like that in the picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: headhunter15
#16
#16
hUTch2002 said:
Looks like you started the same thread right after I did. Great minds?

Cuse scores here and I don’t think Clemson can come back.
Click to expand...

There’s a lot of game left. And to be fair, It’s very much been about the turnover issues today.

The difference has been points gained/lost off of turnovers and lost by trying to go for it on 4th downs (creating 7 more points for Syracuse and between 10 to 6 less for Clemson).

Edit: As I type that, their RB fumbles again.
 
#17
#17
TrueOrange said:
There’s a lot of game left. And to be fair, It’s very much been about the turnover issues today.

has been points off of turnovers and going for it on 4th downs (creating 7 more points for Syracuse and between 10 to 6 less for Clemson).

Edit: As I type that, their RB fumbles again.
Click to expand...
Yeah but Clemson’s O isn’t very good and the Cuse D is solid. Cuse gets up 18 and this one is over. But the Cuse O isn’t very good so I don’t know that they will ever get up that much.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top