NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,763
- Likes
- 82,464
Chill, man. No need to bunch up your panties.How should I know? I'm not a climatologist. I just know that the vast majority of the world's best climatologist seem to be in agreement. Deferring to their expertise seems the wisest option. What's the alternative? Ignore them and hope that they're wrong?
Which is why we will continue to study and learn. If future study shows it was all a false alarm, we will adjust our course according to the newest data. If future study shows it is even worse than we thought, then we will either say "we should have done more" or "I'm glad we acted when we did".Good point. If the habital age of our plannet is 500M years and current observation is 200 years, that is a microscope sample size. Even ice cores going back 50,000 years are a blink in the geologic time.
Good. Observe until you die. Just dont make policy.Which is why we will continue to study and learn. If future study shows it was all a false alarm, we will adjust our course according to the newest data. If future study shows it is even worse than we thought, then we will either say "we should have done more" or "I'm glad we acted when we did".
Which is why we will continue to study and learn. If future study shows it was all a false alarm, we will adjust our course according to the newest data. If future study shows it is even worse than we thought, then we will either say "we should have done more" or "I'm glad we acted when we did".