Climate Change Report

OK it's different, and I'm not claiming it's comparing cars to volcanoes, but have you heard of a little thing called Krakatoa. Man has not come close to competing with that; although the Chinese are trying very hard - with or without their free pass to do so.
Except you have it backwards - the numbers aren't even close to what humans currently produce yearly
 
Except you have it backwards - the numbers aren't even close to what humans currently produce yearly

We must be doing it all wrong then because man (despite all that stuff we spew into the air) hasn't managed a nuclear winter like a single volcano did.
 
What else are you going to say when 95% of those with PhDs all agree and it's counter to your position?

So luther, for those people with PhDs in a field that you consider relevant to evaluate man-made climate change, what kind of jobs do you think they hold?
 
I believe many people with PhDs dont all agree. Which is quite healthy in science. I also believe many PhDs need government funding and alarm bells get more money.

Love the fear.

Sure, they don't all agree, but a large majority do.

You think it's a global conspiracy for scientific funding? Don't suppose you have proof?
 
Sure, they don't all agree, but a large majority do.

You think it's a global conspiracy for scientific funding? Don't suppose you have proof?


My problem with the whole thing is the proposed solutions. There aren’t any.
And there seems to be a serious lack of study, planning, and spending on surviving the coming disasters.
There are plenty of tax plans that won’t change anything but will redistribute wealth.
 
Sure, they don't all agree, but a large majority do.

You think it's a global conspiracy for scientific funding? Don't suppose you have proof?

Since the scientific community has settled the “science” of climate change, there’s no need to continue funding it, correct?

Democrats are so easily duped.
 
My problem with the whole thing is the proposed solutions. There aren’t any.
And there seems to be a serious lack of study, planning, and spending on surviving the coming disasters.
There are plenty of tax plans that won’t change anything but will redistribute wealth.

There can only be one sure answer because more people equals more man-made damage. Nobody is gonna go there. Corner the climate change adherents with population growth, and it all goes away. Poof.
 
Since the scientific community has settled the “science” of climate change, there’s no need to continue funding it, correct?

Democrats are so easily duped.

Due to the nature of the scientific method science is almost never settled. And I didn't say it is in this case. Why is it that so many on the denial side have to resort to conspiracy theories and strawmen?

Should we stop funding the military once we're no longer at war?
 
My problem with the whole thing is the proposed solutions. There aren’t any.
And there seems to be a serious lack of study, planning, and spending on surviving the coming disasters.
There are plenty of tax plans that won’t change anything but will redistribute wealth.

Let's separate climate policy from climate science. Whether anthropogenic climate change is real and what we should do about it if it is real are very different questions. I agree that the policy side is deficient.
 
So luther, for those people with PhDs in a field that you consider relevant to evaluate man-made climate change, what kind of jobs do you think they hold?
I think they hold a variety of different jobs.
 
I'm kind of disappointed the climate change nutters haven't linked the Wutang Flu to climate change yet. Come on dullards, try harder!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
My main question and to be honest here , my objection .. How does us paying untold amounts of money in the end , just to be be a part of some European conglomerate / union/ club, do anything but cause us more debit? We don’t have to pay union dues to take care of our on pollution , we can’t force other countries to do what they agree on paper to do regardless if we are in or out of the club , there’s no secret code to have access to their information , why would we pay X amount of dollars to that fund help us when , if that’s what we want to do , we can just keep the money in house ? I’ll be waiting for this explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and hog88

VN Store



Back
Top