With 3 or 4 spots to fill, UT's star avg is 3.27. I would certainly expect that to improve but you need to remember that UT's class last year with 32 signees @3.65 stars ended up 5th. UK with 28 signees and 3.28 stars was 17th. The lowest avg stars to make the top 10 for 2014 was UF at 3.58.What makes you say that? As of now, we are in 6th, and actually only one point off of 5th spot. And we're still in on a lot of talent, guys like tuttle, van Jefferson, Richmond, Phillips, sapp, and on and on. Top 10 class easy.
If Dormady gets 4* then UT fills the last 4 spots with 4* players... then that's still just an avg of 3.46 stars which would not have made UT's class top 10 in '14 in all likelihood. Yes I realize their computation is more complex than that... but it is a pretty good predictor.
I didn't say that it hasn't really improved. I don't know if Jones' ability to find underrated 3* is superior to Dooley's yet or not. I have simply said that according to Rivals recruiting overall has not improved significantly. Joke or not, that's what the numbers say.And your other post trying to use rivals average star total and saying our recruiting hasn't really improved is a joke.
Dooley recruited kickers. Not sure why anyone puts a longsnapper on scholarship but that's Jones' prerogative.First off, having longsnappers and kickers will drag that avg star ranking down because they don't rank those guys highly.
I hope he's as good as 247 says. Rivals will probably bump him to 3* but having watched this for awhile now... they are resistant to admitting they were wrong. Essentially they'd have to say that someone they previously considered a 4* wasn't as good while Dormady was better. They're stubborn so he probably ends up a 3*. Scout rates him a 3*. ESPN rates him 4* but they are probably the least reliable of the 4.Add in the joke of them having dormady rated a two star while other services consider him a top 200 player factors in.
To say that Dooley's recruiting and that of Kiffin and Fulmer's last few years as well didn't look better on NSD than it did at any time after is what is completely laughable.All it takes is looking at the talent butch Is bringing in with common sense. We have rivals #1 player in the country in McKenzie, 5* Preston Williams, kamara, butcher, Jack Jones, so many guys. And then last years monster class with according to rivals 17 4* and 2 5* players.
To say our recruiting hasn't improved is completely laughable.
According to the recruiting svcs, UT's recruiting by the numbers has not improved significantly. All of them reflect about the same thing though they differ on particular players. None of them show UT spiking in recruit quality. That doesn't mean they won't perform better... it just means what it means. The numbers have not shifted that much.
If you want to throw around words like "laughable" and "common sense" and "joke" then you might want to start reading and dealing with the actual facts at some point. I'm not saying they aren't better players. I'm saying that the recruiting sites and especially Rivals do not yet say that UT is getting talent out of line with what it has gotten for the better part of the last 10 years. Over that time there have been ups and downs but UT avg's right around 3.4 stars. That's about where Jones is for his 3 classes.