(OrangeSquare @ Aug 4 said:Who was it the other day question me by saying this guy had an agenda?
Here he is in the Top 25 thread, and in the first sentance, ANOTHER shot.
As I have said many times before, thats cool. I support his right to do it, but don't tell me he doesn't have an agenda.
I have said for months, I expected 18-25, so 23 is about right.
I believe that would be me O2(OrangeSquare @ Aug 4 said:Who was it the other day question me by saying this guy had an agenda
You are WWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too sensitive Mrs Fulmer(OrangeSquare @ Aug 4 said:Here he is in the Top 25 thread, and in the first sentance, ANOTHER shot.
(MyBloodRunnethOrange @ Aug 5 said:I believe that would be me O2
You are WWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too sensitive Mrs Fulmer![]()
The best I remember in that other thread I asked you to show me where he took a shot, which you refused to do, which just supports my opinion that you are entirely too sensitive. Lighten up bud. We're ALL Vols here (well most of us anyway), but that dosen't mean that we have to hold hands and sing kumbaya.
You have a serious need to lighten up. CPF, as the leader, is responsible for the product on the field, and we, as the customers who have invested our time and money, have the right to critique the product that we recieve. If you choose not to critique that product, that is certainly your right, but everyone who offers a criticism is not taking a shot. Saying that CPF has lost something is not a shot, it is an opinion, and one that quite frankly is supported by the past few seasons. You are the one who needs to open your eyes, because quite frankly, you are still living in 98. Having said that, I am the first to say that I think CPFs past record has earned him the right to turn this thing around, but I'm also the first to say that the team today is nowhere near what we had ten years ago. Can he get it back to that state? Only time will tell.(OrangeSquare @ Aug 5 said:I have no need to lighten up, but you may wanna open your eyes sometime. You see things much more clearly that way.
(MyBloodRunnethOrange @ Aug 5 said:I certainly hope you're wrong about that, but you're probably right, at least until 28 Oct :dance2:
I have read your posts, and know where you stand. I have no problem with you taking up for Fulmer. We certainly need a few people on here who do. I'm simply trying to point out to you that not everyone who makes a reference to Fulmer's system, or levels a criticism of the team or coaching staff is attacking Fulmer personally. Criticism is what one would expect after last year, because the coach is ultimately responsible for the success or failure of the team.(OrangeSquare @ Aug 5 said:Blood Runneth- You must be selectively reading my posts. I have posted on this site that I am not happy with 5-6, and that I'm not even happy with Peach Bowl losses to ACC mid pack teams. I however do know that I can be unhappy without personally attacking Fulmer or blaming him for every single thing that goes on in a 500 mile radius of Knoxville Tennessee. If you don't like me taking up for Phil do what Hat "supposedly" did, and Ignore me, but I will continue to take up for Phil on a personal level whenever I feel he is being unfairly attacked.