JoAllan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 10,112
- Likes
- 14,069
The best part is that is raining on the Coach K parade.Duke is going to lose. That’s big for us. Takes them out of consideration for the 1-seed and gives them one less Q1 win. If we take care of business tomorrow, we’ll be in good position for a high 2-seed. Maybe, just maybe, a small chance at a 1.
Duke is going to lose. That’s big for us. Takes them out of consideration for the 1-seed and gives them one less Q1 win. If we take care of business tomorrow, we’ll be in good position for a high 2-seed. Maybe, just maybe, a small chance at a 1.
There’s really no excuse for us not to be a 1 if we win. Most Q1 games played, will have 2nd most Q1 wins, top 5-7 SOS, 4 top 5 wins etc. But somehow we’ll be passed over for a lesser resume.Duke is going to lose. That’s big for us. Takes them out of consideration for the 1-seed and gives them one less Q1 win. If we take care of business tomorrow, we’ll be in good position for a high 2-seed. Maybe, just maybe, a small chance at a 1.
I’m beyond baffled that Lunardi has us as a 3 seed while “predicting” us as an AQ (meaning we’re obviously SEC champs). There’s not a 2 seed on his lines with a better resume, save maybe Auburn, and we won the head to head and they were the beneficiary of a weak SEC schedule. We’re ahead of every predicted 2 seed in RPI, NET, SOS, Q1 wins, Q1 games played (part of SOS obviously) etc. It doesn’t add up to me.I just don't see how we aren't a 2 seed if we win tomorrow. That Arizona win should carry a ton of weight, not to mention two wins over UK and several other nice wins.
I’m beyond baffled that Lunardi has us as a 3 seed while “predicting” us as an AQ (meaning we’re obviously SEC champs). There’s not a 2 seed on his lines with a better resume, save maybe Auburn, and we won the head to head and they were the beneficiary of a weak SEC schedule. We’re ahead of every predicted 2 seed in RPI, NET, SOS, Q1 wins, Q1 games played (part of SOS obviously) etc. It doesn’t add up to me.
Purdue - 40th SOS, 6-5 Q1
UK - 13th SOS, 7-7 Q1
Duke - 58th SOS, 4-1 Q1
AU - 34th SOS, 7-3 Q1
UT - 4th SOS, 7-7 Q1 (Colorado dropped yesterday pulling a Q1 win from us)
Tennessee is 10-7 in Q1 games, Colorado is still QQ also.I’m beyond baffled that Lunardi has us as a 3 seed while “predicting” us as an AQ (meaning we’re obviously SEC champs). There’s not a 2 seed on his lines with a better resume, save maybe Auburn, and we won the head to head and they were the beneficiary of a weak SEC schedule. We’re ahead of every predicted 2 seed in RPI, NET, SOS, Q1 wins, Q1 games played (part of SOS obviously) etc. It doesn’t add up to me.
Purdue - 40th SOS, 6-5 Q1
UK - 13th SOS, 7-7 Q1
Duke - 58th SOS, 4-1 Q1
AU - 34th SOS, 7-3 Q1
UT - 4th SOS, 7-7 Q1 (Colorado dropped yesterday pulling a Q1 win from us)