I’m beyond baffled that Lunardi has us as a 3 seed while “predicting” us as an AQ (meaning we’re obviously SEC champs). There’s not a 2 seed on his lines with a better resume, save maybe Auburn, and we won the head to head and they were the beneficiary of a weak SEC schedule. We’re ahead of every predicted 2 seed in RPI, NET, SOS, Q1 wins, Q1 games played (part of SOS obviously) etc. It doesn’t add up to me.
Purdue - 40th SOS, 6-5 Q1
UK - 13th SOS, 7-7 Q1
Duke - 58th SOS, 4-1 Q1
AU - 34th SOS, 7-3 Q1
UT - 4th SOS, 7-7 Q1 (Colorado dropped yesterday pulling a Q1 win from us)
We are 10-7 in Q1. Colorado is still at 70.