I agree with that but I do agree with him saying Bailey should play less and the frosh play more
Why? Bailey is a significant threat on the perimeter. Fulky will draw double teams and if JJJ, Springer or Keon can penetrate then who does the defense leave open, Santi or Bailey? Either of then are lethal.
Bailey also has a very quick shot. I want him playing 25 mins a game. I think he can be a more consistent Bowden.
Bailey will get less and less as the season goes I think. I think Vescovi's minutes are going to drop some too from the 1st game. I still contend that JJJ/Keon/Springer have the potential to be the best perimeter defensive trio in the country when on the floor together. So far our offense has looked best when Vescovi and JJJ are on the floor together.I’ll wait to see more before answering that
my guess is right now he settles into that 18-22min a game pattern
I think you are way off on Bailey. You made it sound like he was nowhere close to Bowden. I disagree. I don't see huge difference between what they bring to the table. I really liked Bowden. I saw Bailey defend at similar level and he is a spot up shooter like Bowden. Didn't notice his catch and shoot inside the 3pt line on those curl screens so maybe that is one thing he doesn't bring. But it's really too hard to tell because it was 1 game. You are either too low on Bailey or too high on Bowden if you think there is a massive difference between the two of them. From your other posts, it appears to be more of you being too low on Bailey. He is probably around a 25 min per game player once we settle into a normal rotation.Bailey will get less and less as the season goes I think. I think Vescovi's minutes are going to drop some too from the 1st game. I still contend that JJJ/Keon/Springer have the potential to be the best perimeter defensive trio in the country when on the floor together. So far our offense has looked best when Vescovi and JJJ are on the floor together.
I want to see Keon, springer, Bailey and SV all about 20min give or take a few
JJJ needs to be the one slightly higher around 25 imo
I think you are way off on Bailey. You made it sound like he was nowhere close to Bowden. I disagree. I don't see huge difference between what they bring to the table. I really liked Bowden. I saw Bailey defend at similar level and he is a spot up shooter like Bowden. Didn't notice his catch and shoot inside the 3pt line on those curl screens so maybe that is one thing he doesn't bring. But it's really too hard to tell because it was 1 game. You are either too low on Bailey or too high on Bowden if you think there is a massive difference between the two of them. From your other posts, it appears to be more of you being too low on Bailey. He is probably around a 25 min per game player once we settle into a normal rotation.
The hot offensive start included those 2 AND Bailey on the floor, along with Pons and Fulk, the starting 5. Bailey had the second highest plus/minus on the time, behind Fulk.Bailey will get less and less as the season goes I think. I think Vescovi's minutes are going to drop some too from the 1st game. I still contend that JJJ/Keon/Springer have the potential to be the best perimeter defensive trio in the country when on the floor together. So far our offense has looked best when Vescovi and JJJ are on the floor together.
Barnes chose to match VB up on Colorado's unquestionable best offensive player (and he defended him very well) but Pulaski questions his defensive ability. Seems legit?The hot offensive start included those 2 AND Bailey on the floor, along with Pons and Fulk, the starting 5. Bailey had the second highest plus/minus on the time, behind Fulk.
Barnes chose to match VB up on Colorado's unquestionable best offensive player (and he defended him very well) but Pulaski questions his defensive ability. Seems legit?
Colin is absolutely correct. It was atrocious. It was the play where Vescovi got hit by Keon. They called a charge on that play. The Colorado player never even made contact with the Tennessee player (I think it was Fulky). It might have been the worst call I've seen in quite some time.Provide evidence or I'm calling complete bs on this. I watched the entire game, and the reffing was terrible. However, there was definitely not a charging call with, "no contact at all."
Maybe, I just see him as the weakest of the 5 perimeter players thus in the end he's going to get less minutes and less shots. Bowden is one of the best on the ball defenders that we ever put on the floor, I don't think Bailey will avg 10 a game his career here and I don't see him ever being the defensive player Bowden was. I in no way see him putting up 13 ppg this year.I think you are way off on Bailey. You made it sound like he was nowhere close to Bowden. I disagree. I don't see huge difference between what they bring to the table. I really liked Bowden. I saw Bailey defend at similar level and he is a spot up shooter like Bowden. Didn't notice his catch and shoot inside the 3pt line on those curl screens so maybe that is one thing he doesn't bring. But it's really too hard to tell because it was 1 game. You are either too low on Bailey or too high on Bowden if you think there is a massive difference between the two of them. From your other posts, it appears to be more of you being too low on Bailey. He is probably around a 25 min per game player once we settle into a normal rotation.
Bailey is the weakest of the 5 perimeter guys, his minutes will drop slowly as the year goes by. Come tournament time I just don't see him getting those minutes.The hot offensive start included those 2 AND Bailey on the floor, along with Pons and Fulk, the starting 5. Bailey had the second highest plus/minus on the time, behind Fulk.
Oh, and one more thing I saw that kind of drove me nuts (other than the officiating, lol)... on one play in the 2nd half, JJJ turned down a wide open 3 from a kick-out pass from down low (you know, the ones that get you in perfect shooting rhythm...) to pass it to Pons who was guarded in the corner. I saw some signs of improvement from him, like the very 1st play where he just caught and shot without hesitation, the put-back and-1, and even the drive to the rim near the end of the game where he missed the layup. It doesn't even bother me that he missed that. I was just glad to see him be assertive near the end of the game and try to make something happen. But that 1 play just demonstrated old patterns and habits to me. He's got to shoot that shot!
Just slight correction...IN YOUR OPINION Bailey is the weakest of the 5 perimeter guys. Just got clarity sake I thought I would bring up. Your statement was presented as a fact. It is far from a fact. The person who has the most evidence (Barnes) of who the best players are in the team has a different opinion than you. He clearly trusts Bailey. I know when you draw a line in the sand about an evaluation of a player it is easy to be stubborn about it. It is hard to admit a possible mistake. But the good news is that you can admit it and hang your hat on the idea that you formed that opinion with very little evidence. You didn't actually see him play last season. It was a lot of guesswork. The evidence of Barnes opinion and his 1st game this season say your guesswork was possibly incorrect. No shame in that. It is also obvious the young guys, moreso KJ, will take some of his minutes once he is more comfortable. KJ has a much higher ceiling. He is elite. So his 35 minutes will settle into 22-25 probably. The difference between his defense and Bowden's defense is not nearly as much as you make it out to be, imo.Bailey is the weakest of the 5 perimeter guys, his minutes will drop slowly as the year goes by. Come tournament time I just don't see him getting those minutes.
You seem to value Barnes opinion, my evaluation about Bowden's defense comes from what Barnes has said in the past. I think Coach rewarded Bailey for his hard work the last year this past Tuesday. I also feel that 2 potential lottery picks are not going to set the bench to a decent spot up 3 point shooter. What makes you think he's anything other than a spot up guy based on Tuesdays performance?Just slight correction...IN YOUR OPINION Bailey is the weakest of the 5 perimeter guys. Just got clarity sake I thought I would bring up. Your statement was presented as a fact. It is far from a fact. The person who has the most evidence (Barnes) of who the best players are in the team has a different opinion than you. He clearly trusts Bailey. I know when you draw a line in the sand about an evaluation of a player it is easy to be stubborn about it. It is hard to admit a possible mistake. But the good news is that you can admit it and hang your hat on the idea that you formed that opinion with very little evidence. You didn't actually see him play last season. It was a lot of guesswork. The evidence of Barnes opinion and his 1st game this season say your guesswork was possibly incorrect. No shame in that. It is also obvious the young guys, moreso KJ, will take some of his minutes once he is more comfortable. KJ has a much higher ceiling. He is elite. So his 35 minutes will settle into 22-25 probably. The difference between his defense and Bowden's defense is not nearly as much as you make it out to be, imo.
You should go back and watch, JJJ is the one doing most of the communication on the offensive end. His basketball IQ is one of his best attributes, his instincts are fine, your assessment is wrong I feel.JJJ doesn’t have good instincts on offense. He was late on a couple passes in my rewatching of the game when they went zone that could have lead to open shots
Based on current evidence, "James" Springer (lol at our paid commentator that doesn't know our players names) has a long ways to go to be a lottery pick. If he plays up to that level, then I agree with you that Bailey will certainly see a bigger decrease in minutes. Springer did not show he is near that level yet. Outside of hitting 2 open 3s he did not standout. He did not "pop" off the screen like KJ. I think Springer will turn out to be a great player eventually.You seem to value Barnes opinion, my evaluation about Bowden's defense comes from what Barnes has said in the past. I think Coach rewarded Bailey for his hard work the last year this past Tuesday. I also feel that 2 potential lottery picks are not going to set the bench to a decent spot up 3 point shooter. What makes you think he's anything other than a spot up guy based on Tuesdays performance?
I think Springer is going to be the exact type guard we need to win tournaments. He's a physical athletic kid, much more physical than any of our guards outside of JJJ. Tuesday was the 1st time I saw him play, while his numbers were not great I came away much more impressed with his production in limited minutes as that of Bailey getting the most minutes of the night. I really like Springer, more so than both Bailey and Vescovi in the long run.Based on current evidence, "James" Springer (lol at our paid commentator that doesn't know our players names) has a long ways to go to be a lottery pick. If he plays up to that level, then I agree with you that Bailey will certainly see a bigger decrease in minutes. Springer did not show he is near that level yet. Outside of hitting 2 open 3s he did not standout. He did not "pop" off the screen like KJ. I think Springer will turn out to be a great player eventually.