Originally posted by volinbham@Sep 27, 2005 12:41 AM
My second point is that you're original post discounted the victory and you made a point of highlighting a "molehill" (in your own words). I assume it was influenced by a disappointing loss - very understandable -but I thought it was ironic that you then choose to accuse others of having a slanted view.
[snapback]152876[/snapback]
I didn't mean to discount the victory. Until the 2nd half, TN was not producing. And in the 2nd half, LSU defense was abysmal. So my general opinion of the game was that both teams had flaws. Maybe your problem lies in Erik Ainge, I don't know, I'm not concerned with that, as you might guess. And I'm not here to discuss the technicalities of the 60 minutes of football that was played.
I would explain my point, but it'd be about the 3rd or forth time of repeating myself. I think those that disagree with me are biased. I can't believe my sentiment caused 4 pages of discussion. Maybe because my opinion is so stupidly inconsequential? Be that as it may, it just left a bad taste in my mouth.