jjay2518
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 9,665
- Likes
- 2,447
Common Core Base 10 Way To Add 9 + 6 Takes 54 Seconds | The Daily Caller
In my opinion, this is no different than a child using their fingers to understand why 9+6 is 15. This just makes it more complicated.
I cannot get behind common core.
Here is a quote from the article posted here that you (Chris) may not have read very closely.
Earlier this month, Canadas National Post reported that a group of neuroscientists has issued a study finding that rote memorization of discrete math facts plays a critical role in mathematical development in young children.
In short, the study found, memorizing multiplication tables and answers to basic arithmetic problems is cognitively vital because, without such memorization, children will have a much harder time later on with complex math problems.
Again, if you judge the entirety of CC off of your frustration with that particular problem, you're not really giving it a fair chance. Think of how many kids struggle with long division or algebra. That's where it really makes more sense because everything is so much more organized and coherent. If you do a problem like 27 x 32, you probably know you have to add two numbers together to get the final product after the first couple steps. If you really look at all the steps up until that point, they are pretty random and you can't really explain why you do them, you just know it's the rule. When you see the problem worked out the tradional way and CC way side-by-side, it's glaringly obvious to see how that would make more sense to a student who is learning this level of multiplication for the first time.
I highly doubt there are as many people who share the sentiment of not caring about means to an end as you think.
If the kids are taught this stuff from the beginning, they'll be much better at intermediate and advanced math classes than we ever were IMO. Of course, the simple stuff is overcomplicated, and no one is ever going to go through all those steps in a real-world situation, but you have to grind it out to understand the more complicated stuff down the road.
It seems that this group of neuroscientists don't share your opinion. I think it's a good idea to present new and different ways to approach math problems, but if a kid doesn't need to use this system to understand what's going on, I don't see the point of forcing them to use it.