Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#3,354
#3,354
zeppelin128 said:
Sure I am. I've been hearing about the death of the deep state for about three years now. Funny that it hasn't happened.
Click to expand...
You know how govt works, snails pace. Why are all these Obama administration folks getting criminal defense lawyers? The Dims aren’t happy that Trump is exposing their corruption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, W.TN.Orange Blood, VolnJC and 2 others
#3,355
#3,355
lawgator1 said:
Calls for Barr's removal go back further than this. When he ran interference for Trump in Mueller's report and took the position that Trump cannot even be investigated for wrongdoing it was clear that Barr is just a tool for Trump. Zero integrity. Zero.
Click to expand...


Ran interference for the Mueller report? Despite what we were told for 3 years, there was no impeachable offense. BTW, where is our $40 million refund?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, W.TN.Orange Blood, AirVol and 2 others
#3,358
#3,358
lawgator1 said:
That check will be written right after we get the Benghazi refund.
Click to expand...

You do realize that this Durham investigation is criminal in nature now with grand jury power? It will not be a political stunt like these others, so massive difference. Barr's credibility is not relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#3,359
#3,359
Orangeburst65 said:
You do realize that this Durham investigation is criminal in nature now with grand jury power? It will not be a political stunt like these others, so massive difference. Barr's credibility is not relevant.
Click to expand...

And to think Don Jr and Kushner thought they were out of the woods.
 
#3,360
#3,360
zeppelin128 said:
Gonna be a let down when Barr comes up with nothing, which will be soon.
Click to expand...

Will it turn up nothing because nothing was there to be found, or will it turn up nothing because the subjects are being insulated from retribution? That’s the question that needs to be asked.

With the prior administration, enough evidence has been brought forth to convict Obama, Hillary, Holder and Lynch, yet we’ve seen praise lauded upon them for being supposed good stewards of government power. We know the latter to be BS. Period.

We are three years down the Trump rabbit hole and nothing has risen to the level of impeachment. Since Nov. 2016, your insatiable hunger for removing him from office has been stoked, like coals in a fire, yet you’ve turned up nothing but a rehashed “today is the today” rebuttal and bruised cajones.

When, exactly, are they going to get the Pantone 151 monster? Democrats need to nut up or shut up. If Trump was as reprehensible as you say, he would’ve been impeached and convicted before he was even inaugurated. It doesn’t take this much time to remove someone so ostensibly dangerous. It simply doesn’t. So, you’re left with this: Democrats are a quagmire of utter, complete dumbasses, or Trump is the smartest con man to ever live. Which is it?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,362
#3,362
Oh Clapper, say it ain't so you dirty rat!
Lawyer tells judge FBI manipulated interview memo, alleges Clapper urged reporter to take 'kill shot'
FBI agents manipulated Flynn file, as Clapper allegedly urged ‘kill shot’: court filing
An explosive new court filing from Michael Flynn’s legal team alleges that FBI agents manipulated official records of the former national security adviser’s 2017 interview that led to him being charged with lying to investigators. It's Flynn's lawyers latest attempt to get the case thrown out.
Sidney Powell, Flynn’s attorney, filed a 37-page motion on Thursday, outlining several big allegations, once again requesting the government produce all evidence as it relates to Flynn — urging the court to “dismiss the entire prosecution for outrageous government misconduct” and hold the prosecutors in contempt.
FLYNN LAWYER WANTS PROSECUTORS TO TURN OVER CELLPHONES FROM MYSTERIOUS PROFESSOR LINKED TO RUSSIA PROBE
The entire case stemmed from that FBI interview where Flynn was asked about his conversations with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn ultimately pleaded guilty to making false statements regarding those conversations during his interview, as part of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
But as his legal team goes on offense in the long-running and still unresolved court proceedings, Powell alleged that FBI officials manipulated Flynn’s FBI 302 — a form used by agents to report or summarize interviews. It's not clear who may have done the alleged editing, though ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok was involved in the original interview.
“Those changes added an unequivocal statement that ‘Flynn stated he did not’ — in response to whether Mr. Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a certain manner or slow down the UN vote [on sanctions],” Powell wrote. “This is a deceptive manipulation because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on the issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.”
Powell also alleged that agents added: “or if Kislyak described any Russian response to a request by Flynn.”
...
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, W.TN.Orange Blood, ajvol01 and 2 others
#3,363
#3,363
Orangeburst65 said:
Good point.
Click to expand...

Until someone is indicted, it will be endless speculation. I've not heard a single person say that Durham isn't a man of integrity. Considering that DOJ doesn't comment on investigations, or at least that's policy, we could go round after round with predictions. And I'm sure we will.
 
#3,364
#3,364
This thing is really starting to take the turn straight back to the Dirty DIMs. Boomerang anyone? Lookout LG, I told you this was coming for ya almost 2 years ago.

Geraldo predicts a 'run' on DC defense attorneys as Durham's probe of Trump-Russia investigators deepens

Geraldo predicts a 'run' on DC defense attorneys as Durham's probe of Trump-Russia investigators deepens

Former Obama administration officials should be concerned after the investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe became a criminal matter, Fox News correspondent-at-large Geraldo Rivera said Friday.
U.S. Attorney John Durham's ongoing probe into potential FBI and Justice Department misconduct in the run-up to the 2016 election through the spring of 2017 has transitioned into a full-fledged criminal investigation, two sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News on Thursday night.
"I predict in the next week or two, you're gonna see a run on criminal defense attorneys in Washington, D.C. by people further up the food chain in the previous administration," said Rivera on "Fox & Friends," questioning what former President Barack Obama and his inner circle knew about the probe into Trump's campaign.
"Did Barack Obama know that the intelligence agencies were seeking to delegitimize his successor? At what point did he know? What did he authorize? What role did he play? he asked.
GOP STORMS SECURE ROOM ON CAPITOL HILL, DISRUPTING DEPOSITION
One source added that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's upcoming report on alleged FBI surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign will shed light on why Durham's probe has become a criminal inquiry. Horowitz announced on Thursday his report would be available to the public soon, with "few" redactions.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, VolnJC, Orange_Vol1321 and 2 others
#3,365
#3,365
lawgator1 said:
Calls for Barr's removal go back further than this. When he ran interference for Trump in Mueller's report and took the position that Trump cannot even be investigated for wrongdoing it was clear that Barr is just a tool for Trump. Zero integrity. Zero.
Click to expand...
Good thing Barr hasn’t said that Trump is his homeboy. I mean, it would be ok wouldn’t it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and BigOrangeD
#3,366
#3,366
Shock Filing: Flynn’s Lawyers Claim Proof that Lisa Page Altered FBI Interview Record to Frame Him
1572019180166.jpeg
...
The filing by Flynn’s new legal team, which took over the case several weeks ago, argues that the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted an “ambush-interview” of Flynn in the White House not to discover any evidence of criminal activity, but to coax him into making false statements.
When Flynn’s new lawyer Sidney Powell first made those allegations in September, prosecutors replied that she was indulging in “conspiracy theories” and noted his client had already pleaded guilty to the crime of lying to the FBI in 2017. Flynn has been awaiting sentencing since then, and even told the sentencing judge in 2018 that he would not claim FBI misconduct, despite growing evidence that they had departed from normal practice in interviewing him and had only completed their “302” — the report of their meeting — after he had already been forced to resign from his position in the administration over the allegations.
The new defense filing alleges that the government is refusing to turn over a mountain of potentially exculpatory evidence, some of which has begun to emerge in the media — either through leaks or through ongoing inquiries into the origins of the probe into alleged Russia “collusion” with the Trump campaign, later found not to exist.
That evidence, Flynn’s legal team alleges, includes an apparent admission by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page — who resigned after being discovered having an affair with agent Peter Strzok, with whom she shared anti-trump texts — that she had edited the 302 — something that she allegedly told FBI investigators she did not recall, the filing states.

...
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, W.TN.Orange Blood, VolnJC and 3 others
#3,367
#3,367
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol and BigOrangeD
#3,369
#3,369
Stew Cook said:
Until someone is indicted, it will be endless speculation. I've not heard a single person say that Durham isn't a man of integrity. Considering that DOJ doesn't comment on investigations, or at least that's policy, we could go round after round with predictions. And I'm sure we will.
Click to expand...

My point to LG was in reference to Barr's credibility, which I tried to point out was irrelevant to a criminal investigation.
 
#3,373
#3,373
Orangeburst65 said:
You do realize that this Durham investigation is criminal in nature now with grand jury power? It will not be a political stunt like these others, so massive difference. Barr's credibility is not relevant.
Click to expand...


I am sure of two things:

One is that the investigation of the investigation is just Trump and his allies coming up with deep state and other conspiracy theories to serve as a pro-Trump narrative in the face of impeachment.

Second is that there is no way you will ever admit that.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top