Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#351
#351
Weezer said:
But it was classified when she emailed it. She mishandled classified information. Wouldn't matter if that information was declassified after the fact. It was still classified when the crime was committed.
Click to expand...

Yes, she should have used her official State Department email. I'm sure that was secure. :)
 
#352
#352
hog88 said:
Kinda my thinking. If it's obstruction of justice for Trump to fire Comey what do you call deleting emails and destroying devices after subpoenas had been issued? Not to mention a clandestine meeting with the AG?
Click to expand...




200w.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#353
#353
lawgator1 said:
Another question for the jury. I'm happy to go before them, play it, and let you argue that is not what he meant.


Good f'ing luck with that. You'll need it.
Click to expand...

Is an interview with Lester Holt considered sworn testimony?

You're delusional. Get help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#356
#356
Mick said:
Yes, she should have used her official State Department email. I'm sure that was secure. :)
Click to expand...

Probably far more secure than her private server, not to mention, if it were hacked, it's lack of security wouldn't fall squarely in her lap. Spin it anyway you want, but what she did was illegal. People with political motive to protect her determined not to prosecute. How does that not stink to high hell?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#359
#359
Trump is accused of a crime. No proof of guilt has been presented. Despite that, the left is screaming for impeachment. Hillary admitted to a crime. She admitted she used her private server. The investigation found classified information had travelled through her email. The fact they chose not to prosecute does not excuse that a crime was committed. Despite that, the left still tried to get her elected. How much more hypocritical can you get?


If this is about demanding justice, clean your own house first. Otherwise it screams of vengeance for a perceived slight of Hillary not getting her turn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#360
#360
orangeluvr said:
What was clinton's wrong doing,other having her e-mail on a private server, which was a very bad mistake. This is the old attack the cops routine. A witch hunt by nunes his minions and right wing media . Some folks will wind up looking silly and it won't be Mueller!
Click to expand...

Part of the problem with your question as to what Hillary did wrong, is that no one investigated her, so that can't be fully answered. And the cops who refused to investigate her need to be attacked.

PS. I fixed your quote tags. Don't screw it up for the rest of us again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#361
#361
AM64 said:
A lot of people actually like it when government robs Peter to care for them; they generally have no problem ignoring the final fiscal reckoning. The rest of us have seen enough to decipher the writing on the wall - Greece is the word.
Click to expand...

Does it bother you that Bill Gates has shouldered the burden of funding our military a hundred thousandfold of what you have been asked to shoulder?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#364
#364
Weezer said:
Probably far more secure than her private server, not to mention, if it were hacked, it's lack of security wouldn't fall squarely in her lap. Spin it anyway you want, but what she did was illegal. People with political motive to protect her determined not to prosecute. How does that not stink to high hell?
Click to expand...

The George W. Bush White House ‘Lost’ 22 Million Emails

For 18 months, Republican strategists, political pundits, reporters and Americans who follow them have been pursuing Hillary Clinton’s personal email habits, and no evidence of a crime has been found. But now they at least have the skills and interest to focus on a much larger and deeper email conspiracy, one involving war, lies, a private server run by the Republican Party and contempt of Congress citations—all of it still unsolved and unpunished.

Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails. This correspondence included millions of emails written during the darkest period in America’s recent history, when the Bush administration was ginning up support for what turned out to be a disastrous war in Iraq with false claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, later, when it was firing U.S. attorneys for political reasons.

Like Clinton, the Bush White House used a private email server—its was owned by the Republican National Committee. And the Bush administration failed to store its emails, as required by law, and then refused to comply with a congressional subpoena seeking some of those emails. “It’s about as amazing a double standard as you can get,”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#366
#366
Orange_Crush said:
Part of the problem with your question as to what Hillary did wrong, is that no one investigated her, so that can't be fully answered. And the cops who refused to investigate her need to be attacked.

PS. I fixed your quote tags. Don't screw it up for the rest of us again.
Click to expand...

She was investigated. People with political motive declined to prosecute.

JMO, but most likely because the evidence showed her to be guilty, and they didn't want to see her get convicted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#369
#369
luthervol said:
Doesn't bother me in the least. I think that is the way it has to be. Bill Gates even admits that he is undertaxed when compared to the middle class tax burden.
Click to expand...

I think I misunderstood. I have no problem with Gates being taxed a lower percentage of his income then me
 
#371
#371
Weezer said:
Probably far more secure than her private server, not to mention, if it were hacked, it's lack of security wouldn't fall squarely in her lap. Spin it anyway you want, but what she did was illegal. People with political motive to protect her determined not to prosecute. How does that not stink to high hell?
Click to expand...

It was hacked.

What she did that was so nefarious was not "archive" her email to a government server within I think 6 months, which is required by the Freedom Of Information Act. That is all. Look it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#372
#372
luthervol said:
The George W. Bush White House ‘Lost’ 22 Million Emails

For 18 months, Republican strategists, political pundits, reporters and Americans who follow them have been pursuing Hillary Clinton’s personal email habits, and no evidence of a crime has been found. But now they at least have the skills and interest to focus on a much larger and deeper email conspiracy, one involving war, lies, a private server run by the Republican Party and contempt of Congress citations—all of it still unsolved and unpunished.

Clinton’s email habits look positively transparent when compared with the subpoena-dodging, email-hiding, private-server-using George W. Bush administration. Between 2003 and 2009, the Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails. This correspondence included millions of emails written during the darkest period in America’s recent history, when the Bush administration was ginning up support for what turned out to be a disastrous war in Iraq with false claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, later, when it was firing U.S. attorneys for political reasons.

Like Clinton, the Bush White House used a private email server—its was owned by the Republican National Committee. And the Bush administration failed to store its emails, as required by law, and then refused to comply with a congressional subpoena seeking some of those emails. “It’s about as amazing a double standard as you can get,”
Click to expand...

First, I'd argue that statement in the first paragraph "no evidence of a crime has been found". It was shown classified information travelled through her unsecure private server. That alone proves a crime was committed.

Second, if y'all want to chase after W, go ahead. Won't ruffle my feathers. If you can prove he committed a crime, by all means, prosecute him.

I'm all about justice, not hiding crimes by certain individuals while chasing after others.
 
#375
#375
Mick said:
It was hacked.

What she did that was so nefarious was not "archive" her email to a government server within I think 6 months, which is required by the Freedom Of Information Act. That is all. Look it up.
Click to expand...

What she did is mishandle classified information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top