Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

Ok you’ve sold me on the dumbass schtick I’m convinced on this topic you walked in totally clueless and have been back pedaling since. Good job! 👍
Look, if you need to talk about me, you have a therapy group for that.

Are you saying she actually admitted it? What are you trying to say? Use your words.
 
Look, if you need to talk about me, you have a therapy group for that.

Are you saying she actually admitted it? What are you trying to say? Use your words.
We already did. Multiple times. Your drive by “leave this here” is not in contention with my reply to sister evil. Now you’re in a spiral of self rope a dope trying to deflect away from. It. #walkaway
 
We already did. Multiple times. Your drive by “leave this here” is not in contention with my reply to sister evil. Now you’re in a spiral of self rope a dope trying to deflect away from. It. #walkaway

Maybe somebody else can come along and explain it, since you can’t.

Are you saying it’s not discrediting to accuse someone of being a political hack? To be unable to separate their work form their personal political opinions?

These are softballs. Just explain yourself.
 
Maybe somebody else can come along and explain it, since you can’t.

Are you saying it’s not discrediting to accuse someone of being a political hack? To be unable to separate their work form their personal political opinions?

These are softballs. Just explain yourself.
So you are her boyfriend then? Big of you.

As I’ve stated multiple times now she offered no reason for her resignation. And we’ve seen zero evidence of a “poison pill” which was my initial reply upon which you tripped over walking in here.

Your turn.
 
So you are her boyfriend then? Big of you.

As I’ve stated multiple times now she offered no reason for her resignation. And we’ve seen zero evidence of a “poison pill” which was my initial reply upon which you tripped over walking in here.

Your turn.
Dude, do you even know what a poison pill is?
 
So you are her boyfriend then? Big of you.

As I’ve stated multiple times now she offered no reason for her resignation. And we’ve seen zero evidence of a “poison pill” which was my initial reply upon which you tripped over walking in here.

Your turn.

Nice try. This bastardization of your “initial reply” isn’t even related to what I asked you to explain. If you don’t even know what you were trying to say, how is anybody else supposed to?
 
Nice try. This bastardization of your “initial reply” isn’t even related to what I asked you to explain. If you don’t even know what you were trying to say, how is anybody else supposed to?
OMFG just walk away. You’re busted. As I stated there were several possibilities to examine from the source article. But you come in hot defending her honor because you infer that I called her a political hack. As I’ve said multiple times now she offered no reason for her resignation. Again #walkaway
 
OMFG just walk away. You’re busted. As I stated there were several possibilities to examine from the source article. But you come in hot defending her honor because you infer that I called her a political hack. As I’ve said multiple times now she offered no reason for her resignation. Again #walkaway
I didn’t say you called her a political hack? What are you even talking about, Don?

You said yourself, that’s mentioned in the article. I’m asking you to explain why you felt it necessary to say that it was in the article, when that was quite obviously the conversation we were in the middle of having.

I mean when you’re at work and people are talking about the Cowboys, do you blurt out “hey the cowboys, they play in Dallas?!” Don’t you think people would say “why are you telling me this?”

And what is with this boyfriend stuff? Are you saying we should automatically question the objectivity of someone who relies on a defense as ****** as “anonymous sources not allowed?” I mean I’d actually agree with you on that, but since you made that argument I’m assuming that’s not what you’re saying.
 
I didn’t say you called her a political hack? What are you even talking about, Don?

You said yourself, that’s mentioned in the article. I’m asking you to explain why you felt it necessary to say that it was in the article, when that was quite obviously the conversation we were in the middle of having.

I mean when you’re at work and people are talking about the Cowboys, do you blurt out “hey the cowboys, they play in Dallas?!” Don’t you think people would say “why are you telling me this?”

And what is with this boyfriend stuff? Are you saying we should automatically question the objectivity of someone who relies on a defense as ****** as “anonymous sources not allowed?” I mean I’d actually agree with you on that, but since you made that argument I’m assuming that’s not what you’re saying.
Cheezitz fookin rice that’s a lot of words to say “I dropped a reference trying to throw shade and stepped on my own tool instead”

I pointed out the origin article did not agree with sister’s post or the tweet. Sounds like you agree with me then. I accept your apology on walking blindly into a discussion without knowing what the hell you were talking about.
 
Cheezitz fookin rice that’s a lot of words to say “I dropped a reference trying to throw shade and stepped on my own tool instead”

I pointed out the origin article did not agree with sister’s post or the tweet. Sounds like you agree with me then. I accept your apology on walking blindly into a discussion without knowing what the hell you were talking about.

Yeah, that’s about as accurate a recitation as I’d expect from somebody who makes random ass posts and then gets pissy about his inability to explain his own posts. Which is to say, it’s not close at all.

Why don’t you concentrate on figuring out why you felt it necessary to ejaculate that it’s “apparent that she admitted to being unable to separate her politics from her work” or whatever you said, during a conversation that was obviously about that. Once you’ve mastered understanding your own writings you can move on to interpreting what other people have to say.
 
Yeah, that’s about as accurate a recitation as I’d expect from somebody who makes random ass posts and then gets pissy about his inability to explain his own posts. Which is to say, it’s not close at all.

Why don’t you concentrate on figuring out why you felt it necessary to ejaculate that it’s “apparent that she admitted to being unable to separate her politics from her work” or whatever you said, during a conversation that was obviously about that. Once you’ve mastered understanding your own writings you can move on to interpreting what other people have to say.
A simple “ok I was wrong and stepped on my tool” from you would have sufficed. Look where you wander next time ... “counselor”
 
Saying she can’t separate her politics from her professionalism is discrediting. Are you really saying it’s somehow not?
I've been very clear as to what I've been saying. You're obviously bright enough not to have missed the "Or..." and "could..." in his statement. I'll just assume you're arguing to save face.

Good evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
At best, we’re competing for a distant second.
I've been very clear as to what I've been saying. You're obviously bright enough not to have missed the "Or..." and "could..." in his statement. I'll just assume you're arguing to save face.

Good evening.
🤷‍♂️😂

Good evening OC. Try not to trip over yourself anymore Rocky.
 
I find it hilarious that you're conflating a poison pill with poisoning the well.
OMFG. Those are both YOUR statements! I answered your questions 😂

“Sure. A tactic to “poison” a specific action and make it undesirable to execute. But Barr executed a poison pill here sister?”

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I already pointed out YOU confusing the two!
 

VN Store



Back
Top