whodeycin85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,321
- Likes
- 10,113
soft coup, silent coup or a bloodless coup. Play semantics all you want but it was absolutely an unlawful seizure of power to remove a sitting potus. Unimaginable yet here we are with half the voting populace defending the move
Moving that first debate all the way up to June was unprecedented. Klain's explanation is the only one that makes sense. The debates in the General Election never begin before either party has held their convention. This year, we had a debate a full 3 weeks prior to the Republican National Convention. The Democrats wanted to see how Biden held up ... and if he bombed? They wanted time to replace him. According to Klain, it wasn't a certainty that Biden would be replaced. Everything hinged on his performance in that debate. After Biden's comatose-like effort ... it was a sure thing that he would be pressured to step aside.So everybody knew months ahead except for Biden, kind of sounds like a coup..... I dunno
No. Jokes are usually funny. Nothing funny at all about what they are doingFor this to be true, there are a few inconvenient truths happening simultaneously.
1. Democrats planned a maneuver to oust Biden while at the same time exalting his ability and fitness.
2. Democrats showed Americans Biden isn't capable of campaigning and yet they, by omission, have concluded he is still capable of leading the country.
3. If Biden made the choice, he also admits he isn't capable of campaigning but he is still capable of leading the country.
It's all such a joke.