W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 127,662
- Likes
- 328,427
Edit to note I'm laughing at your response on this one and not the mixed facts on the other stories. Obviously, this is a tragedy regardless of intent.
Wait, so he's not a white guy? A bunch of people on here said he was white.
One does not have to be caucasian, "white," or of European ancestry to harbor resentment and ill will to racial minorities. The effort to marginalize what occurred based on his race is pathetic as it does not address the real issue, which is not his own race but his hatred of racial minorities.
I'm pointing out the narrative the media uses. According to the media, of they're white, then it's reported, if they're not white then it is buried. Incident should ever be marginalized when it comes to innocent people being killed. However, the media doesn't see it this way
They are reporting this and he's not white. So, tends to prove not that the race of the perpetrator matters, whereas their motive does.
Black, white, purple, brown, whatever. The race of the shooter is tangentially related to the reason he does what he does. He could be an anarchist, anti-gay, mad about disability benefits being cut, pizzed at an old girlfriend. That's what matters and should be reported.
I think what bothers you is that, while motives come in all shapes and sizes, there has been a distinct pattern of anti-minority race-based sentiment behind so many of these, particularly the completely random ones. So when mainstream folks express worry about how GOP politicians seem to creep up right to the edge of calling for violence, that contributes to the toxic atmosphere of the loons actually promoting or even celebrating these acts.
Its long past the point where plausible deniability for comments about "resorting to Second Amendment rights" and the like can be separated from these acts.
Another shooting & killing going on by the mentally insane.
anti-minority? as usual your conclusions are as accurate as a scud missile. it is the media who downplays assaults, murders or crimes if that person doing the act is a certain race. yes, they will report it but those stories die quickly and are not talked about again. it's comedy that you accuse the gop of going to the edge to call for violence when so many politicians in your party did call for violence. are you really that unaware?
That's because a shooting over a robbery or gang violence is not political, whereas it is newsworthy when a randomized mass shooting is.
But it is only politicized when the shooter is defined as some right wing person, yet if it's not a "ring wing" person it is not reported as a political narrative. Everyone with any sense of objectivity knows its better to be a political leftist when doing some criminal act than being on the right.
I get that the right wants more attention on these more basic crimes, such as gangs or robberies, to justify their continued obsession with owning a lot of firepower. That's a fine argument. I think its misplaced but I acknowledge the logic of it. Even then, it does not answer the fact that guns are being abused in a wholly different manner by those with a warped political agenda.
No, that's not accurate at all. There is no need to justify owning guns. Your party's agenda of letting bad people go is all gun owners need to justify carrying weapons. There are thousands of stories of people defending themselves with guns that is never in the news, ( which is proves my point of media bias). Our culture doesn't want to know the reasons behind these killings.
No, that's not accurate at all. There is no need to justify owning guns. Your party's agenda of letting bad people go is all gun owners need to justify carrying weapons. There are thousands of stories of people defending themselves with guns that is never in the news, ( which is proves my point of media bias). Our culture doesn't want to know the reasons behind these killings.