Your post on the first page ( "No matter who wins, our daily lives won't be affected much"), caused me to change my mind several times on whether I agreed or not. I agreed when I first read it, but then I thought about it.Please bring Uranus to the thread.
That's cool. Disagreement doesn't mean disagreeable with you. I respect those who approach it like that.Your post on the first page ( "No matter who wins, our daily lives won't be affected much"), caused me to change my mind several times on whether I agreed or not. I agreed when I first read it, but then I thought about it.
Edit: I thought it was in that thread. It wasn't, it was in the Harris vs Trump thread.
Anyway, I've decided that I think i know what you mean and I get it, but I just can't agree with it. Someone quoted it and said they wish more people understood that. Not sure why.
Please explain to me what I should say in disagreeing with you. Lol. That's a Joke in case you missed it.That's cool. Disagreement doesn't mean disagreeable with you. I respect those who approach it like that.
I can unpack it more if you want. Not here, of course.
I get that and agree to a point. That's the way it should be and is for many, but it's also not for many.
That's not really what we were talking about but I guess we were done with it. LulzI want a candidate who reduces size, spending, and power of federal govt. I want one who is not on the fringes of social issues. I want one who will propose and execute a competent immigration policy that takes into account patroling the border and not turning a blind eye to those already here.
One candidate might be slightly better than the other but neither fill any of those qualities...