Am I the only one who's not getting what's supposed to be so bad about Martin's profile in the OP? Sure, UT underachieved in the postseason this year, but I see nothing wrong with his profile at Missouri State. He won a tournament, lost mostly to higher seated teams while beating the opponents he was supposed to in the other ones, and even as a #1 seed still made it to the finals in a solid conference. Am I missing something here?