Debbie Schultz Threatens Police Chief

#426
#426
Mick said:
Actually you did

"on what the DNC (of some of the Congressional members) may have been hiding or actions they took."

That is your focus not that all indications point that Awan stole Democrat's emails and information and it just so happen that a bunch of emails found their way to WikiLeaks (maybe not from him but looking that way). He probably didn't read any of them. It was an information grab to be sold to the highest bidder or he was working for someone. Putin has deep pockets and a cyber army.

Still many unanswered questions from the information at hand but hoping that it leads to dirt on Democrats is weak.
Click to expand...

I said they may have - no big stretch considering DWS's attempts.

If this is only about Awan stealing email and selling them to Russia why on earth would DWS be acting the way she is?

I'm not hoping it leads to dirt - I'm speculating that it will given what we know so far. You are speculating some group was out to get Democrats and paid Awan for the information. Is that weak? The TrumpPutin thread is rampant with speculation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#427
#427
volinbham said:
I said they may have - no big stretch considering DWS's attempts.

If this is only about Awan stealing email and selling them to Russia why on earth would DWS be acting the way she is?

I'm not hoping it leads to dirt - I'm speculating that it will given what we know so far. You are speculating some group was out to get Democrats and paid Awan for the information. Is that weak? The TrumpPutin thread is rampant with speculation.
Click to expand...

I will get back to thinking Awan stole democratic emails and information at a time when democratic emails were dumped to WikiLeaks whom is suspected of working with the Russians and I will continue to speculate that Awan is the link.
 
#428
#428
Mick said:
Actually you did

"on what the DNC (of some of the Congressional members) may have been hiding or actions they took."

That is your focus not that all indications point that Awan stole Democrat's emails and information and it just so happen that a bunch of emails found their way to WikiLeaks (maybe not from him but looking that way). He probably didn't read any of them. It was an information grab to be sold to the highest bidder or he was working for someone. Putin has deep pockets and a cyber army.

Still many unanswered questions from the information at hand but hoping that it leads to dirt on Democrats is weak.
Click to expand...

You can admit her actions look highly suspicious without casting blame. Why would she threaten the LEOs over the situation? It's not her personal property, so there was no need for that.

Objectively looking at it, it did appear she had something to hide rather than fully cooperating with the authorities.
 
#430
#430
Grand Vol said:
You can admit her actions look highly suspicious without casting blame. Why would she threaten the LEOs over the situation? It's not her personal property, so there was no need for that.

Objectively looking at it, it did appear she had something to hide rather than fully cooperating with the authorities.
Click to expand...

Fear. If she thought it was her property when they told her about it and no warrant was obtained. I can imagine the LEO telling her "We found a laptop with your name on it and we are investigating it". I wouldn't be cooperative either if I wasn't given anymore information than that. It's obvious she was ignorant of the laptops existence. That is why she freaked out. Or it could be the alternative that it is hers and has been suspected of being involved in a "know crime"(data theft) and she was the one doing it. I would freak out in that case as well.
 
#432
#432
Mick said:
Fear. If she thought it was her property when they told her about it and no warrant was obtained. I can imagine the LEO telling her "We found a laptop with your name on it and we are investigating it". I wouldn't be cooperative either if I wasn't given anymore information than that. It's obvious she was ignorant of the laptops existence. That is why she freaked out. Or it could be the alternative that it is hers and has been suspected of being involved in a "know crime"(data theft) and she was the one doing it. I would freak out in that case as well.
Click to expand...

You might want to go back and read the original article about it.
 
#434
#434
Mick said:
Right, I'm not sure how exactly thing went down. Is this the same laptop they found in the phone booth that had her user account as the login?
Click to expand...

The one they found in another building entirely from her office and the one they told her was being confiscated as evidence in their investigation.

Check out the OP.
 
#435
#435
Grand Vol said:
The one they found in another building entirely from her office and the one they told her was being confiscated as evidence in their investigation.

Check out the OP.
Click to expand...

Are you intentionally not answering in a simple yes or no? I'm going to assume yes. Wouldn't find it in the OP with all of it's unfounded allegations against her. I looked past that and it has no substance other than the IT guy's name is Awan and the laptop is suspected of data transfers. The OP is outdated and slanted to begin with. DWS is not the story folks.
 
#436
#436
Mick said:
I will get back to thinking Awan stole democratic emails and information at a time when democratic emails were dumped to WikiLeaks whom is suspected of working with the Russians and I will continue to speculate that Awan is the link.
Click to expand...

No problem.

Doesn't do a thing to explain why DWS has treated this the way she has though.
 
#437
#437
Mick said:
Fear. If she thought it was her property when they told her about it and no warrant was obtained. I can imagine the LEO telling her "We found a laptop with your name on it and we are investigating it". I wouldn't be cooperative either if I wasn't given anymore information than that. It's obvious she was ignorant of the laptops existence. That is why she freaked out. Or it could be the alternative that it is hers and has been suspected of being involved in a "know crime"(data theft) and she was the one doing it. I would freak out in that case as well.
Click to expand...

She was ignorant of it's existence? How do you come to that conclusion - it was her laptop. Why do you think they didn't have a warrant? I'm betting they obtained one.

Let's review a few things that we know so far:

1) it was her laptop that was found
2) even though an open investigation showed Awan had a secret server and was dumping data onto Dropbox was revealed in Feb, she kept Awan on her payroll even though he was banned from doing IT work for Congress. She kept paying him until he was arrested (May IIRC).
3) when news of Awan started leaking rather than saying oh crap, I can't believe I had that guy working for me she instead accused anyone speaking badly about the guy of being Islamophobic.
4) she threatened the police with cutting their funding if they didn't return her laptop.
5) she's trying to claim some Congressional privileged information to stop looking into the contents of the laptop.


That's just off the top of my head - surely this raises some suspicions no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#440
#440
#441
#441
LouderVol said:
anyone know what a picture of the physical server would do? Maybe tell investigators what type it was and its specs. but I don't see how it could lead to any real info (on the data, what came through the machine, what it is connected or not to). unless they can track what type of machine the data is stored on
Click to expand...

An "image" is something that you can rebuild the server exactly how it was when the "image" was created. All programs, files, user data, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#443
#443
Mick said:
Are you intentionally not answering in a simple yes or no? I'm going to assume yes. Wouldn't find it in the OP with all of it's unfounded allegations against her. I looked past that and it has no substance other than the IT guy's name is Awan and the laptop is suspected of data transfers. The OP is outdated and slanted to begin with. DWS is not the story folks.
Click to expand...

The answer is no, it was not her laptop.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/04/w...ought-to-keep-from-police-was-awans-not-hers/
 
#445
#445
Grand Vol said:
The answer is no, it was not her laptop.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/04/w...ought-to-keep-from-police-was-awans-not-hers/
Click to expand...

A little murky

http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/06/exclusive-did-imran-want-capitol-police-to-find-wasserman-schultzs-laptop/

The laptop had the username “RepDWS,” even though the Florida Democrat and former Democratic National Committee chairman previously said it was Awan’s computer and that she had never even seen it.
Click to expand...

Verderosa told her the laptop couldn’t be returned because it was tied to a criminal suspect. Wasserman Schultz reiterated that, while Awan was a suspect, the computer should be returned because it is “a member’s … if the member is not under investigation.”
Click to expand...

She changed her story two months later, claiming it was Awan’s laptop — bought with taxpayer funds from her office — and she had never seen it. She said she only sought to protect Awan’s rights. “This was not my laptop,” she said August 3. “I have never seen that laptop. I don’t know what’s on the laptop.”
Click to expand...

From another article

She said the laptop in question was issued by her office to Awan. “He accidentally left it somewhere,” a loss Wasserman Schultz said was reported to the Capitol Police. When the Capitol Police recovered the laptop, the agency wanted to search its contents.

She said she has agreed to allow the police to examine the laptop and wasn’t attempting to hide anything. “This was not my laptop. I have never seen that laptop. I don’t know what’s on the laptop,” she said.
Click to expand...

As to the accidentally left it somewhere

U.S. Capitol Police found the laptop after midnight April 6, 2017, in a tiny room that formerly served as a phone booth in the Rayburn House Office Building, according to a Capitol Police report reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. Alongside the laptop were a Pakistani ID card, copies of Awan’s driver’s license and congressional ID badge, and letters to the U.S. attorney. Police also found notes in a composition notebook marked “attorney-client privilege.”
Click to expand...

That's a pretty big oopsie

This article (where she claims it wasn't hers) is full of chuckles.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/fl-reg-wasserman-schultz-discusses-imran-awan-20170802-story.html

“I had grave concerns about his due process rights being violated,” she said. “When their investigation was reviewed with me, I was presented with no evidence of anything that they were being investigated for. And so that, in me, gave me great concern that his due process rights were being violated. That there were racial and ethnic profiling concerns that I had,” she said.
Click to expand...

She left out of course this from the article I posted earlier today

Police grew suspicious and requested a copy of the server early this year, but they were provided with an elaborate falsified image designed to hide the massive violations. The falsified image is what ultimately triggered their ban from the House network Feb. 2, according to a senior House official with direct knowledge of the investigation.
Click to expand...

Yet she says of poor Awan

Wasserman Schultz said the chiefs of staff were told that Awan and his family members were having their access to the House IT network cut off because they were under investigation for “procurement violations and data transfer violations.” Wasserman Schultz said from what she has been able to discern the data transfer issue doesn’t involve anything sinister.
Click to expand...

We shall see where this leads.
 
#446
#446
Mick said:
That contradicts bham. Maybe you two should straighten that out before we continue.
Click to expand...

See my most recent post. She claimed it wasn't hers in an interview with her local paper. In an early inquiry she implied it belonged to a Congressional member and the user name was RepDWS.

Let's call it an unknown at this point. Makes it even stranger she'd be so protective a of laptop that not only wasn't hers but that she'd never seen before eh?
 
#447
#447
volinbham said:
See my most recent post. She claimed it wasn't hers in an interview with her local paper. In an early inquiry she implied it belonged to a Congressional member and the user name was RepDWS.

Let's call it an unknown at this point. Makes it even stranger she'd be so protective a of laptop that not only wasn't hers but that she'd never seen before eh?
Click to expand...

I think the dailycaller is getting you worked up over nothing. They set it up so you think just that.
 
#448
#448
LouderVol said:
anyone know what a picture of the physical server would do? Maybe tell investigators what type it was and its specs. but I don't see how it could lead to any real info (on the data, what came through the machine, what it is connected or not to). unless they can track what type of machine the data is stored on
Click to expand...

Basically you make a "disc image" of the server's hard drive which allows you perform forensics on it without fear of destroying any data or making data become unrecoverable. Example is an .iso file that you create from a disc so you can make a copy to another disc and maintain the file and directory structure. One of the Windows versions had a backup method that created an image file of the hard drive if you ever needed to restore it. Same principal, except in this case they're using it for forensics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#450
#450
LouderVol said:
anyone know what a picture of the physical server would do? Maybe tell investigators what type it was and its specs. but I don't see how it could lead to any real info (on the data, what came through the machine, what it is connected or not to). unless they can track what type of machine the data is stored on
Click to expand...

I think this is it. Can't tell much from the photo

3296197292_8bf2a8a0dd_b.jpg


:lol:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top