Decorated Army surgeon refuses to obey all military orders

#6
#6
VolInMn said:
I'd say you're right. He'll probably get a Dishonorable.
Click to expand...

A commissioned officer cannot receive a dishonorable, only a dismissal. The most he will get, imo, is an admin seperation, not punitive. But thats jmo
 
#7
#7
BearCat204 said:
A commissioned officer cannot receive a dishonorable, only a dismissal. The most he will get, imo, is an admin seperation, not punitive. But thats jmo
Click to expand...

That's not true. Commissioned officers get DDs.

He makes too much noise and acts foolish in trying to embarrass the CinC and they'll make an example of him.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#10
#10
The problem with his logic is that any member of the military could question the authority of the CinC to give an order. Imagine members of the Iraqi deployment saying they wouldn't go because they questioned whetherBush had the authority to declare war under the WPA.

The guy's a tool.
 
#13
#13
lawgator1 said:
The problem with his logic is that any member of the military could question the authority of the CinC to give an order. Imagine members of the Iraqi deployment saying they wouldn't go because they questioned whetherBush had the authority to declare war under the WPA.

The guy's a tool.
Click to expand...

His logic is fine as is anyone else's raising a question. His problem is that, by law, he is obligated to follow the orders of those appointed over him, period. His little charade will not end well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#18
#18
That is quite a large leap........... I in no way would cheapn what the founders did by comparing them to this twit.
 
#19
#19
BigPapaVol said:
His logic is fine as is anyone else's raising a question. His problem is that, by law, he is obligated to follow the orders of those appointed over him, period. His little charade will not end well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


Oh, he's of course free to have his opinion. But, not only is it not his role to be the decider of Obama's eligibility to be the POTUS, it is also the case that his refusal to follow an order based on this is simply illegal.

I think we are on the same page.



CountVolcula said:
I will disagree. Many thought the 1st Continental Congress were idiots but you see what several men, of great purpose, did for this great nation.
Click to expand...


As was the actions of the South in declaring civil war. Or Hutaree in their effort to start one.
 
#20
#20
lawgator1 said:
As was the actions of the South in declaring civil war. Or Hutaree in their effort to start one.
Click to expand...

Of all the Liberal and unamerican things you have said, this takes the cake. What he is doing does not compare and comparing the 1st CC to the south and Hutaree. You need help!!
 
Last edited:
#21
#21
I have no idea why LG brought up Hutaree but the civil war is an interesting question.

Did the south have a legal right to do what they did?
 
#22
#22
CountVolcula said:
Of all the Liberal and unamerican things you have said, this takes the cake. What he is doing does not compare and comparing the 1st CC to the south and Hutaree. You need help!!
Click to expand...


Why not? He's refusing to obey what he thinks are unlawful orders. Over a political dispute.
 
#24
#24
lawgator1 said:
Oh, he's of course free to have his opinion. But, not only is it not his role to be the decider of Obama's eligibility to be the POTUS
Click to expand...

Its is every persons right. Remember, its the government of the people, by the people, for the people, regardless of what you are told.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top