PKT_VOL
Veni, Vidi, Vici
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2009
- Messages
- 17,392
- Likes
- 9,692
You could apply a statistical value to "rich". 1, 2, or 3 standard deviation off the mean? It would also give you a value of "poor".
Wonder what that is given that 2% of households make $250K or more. That's 3 SDs off the mean of a normal distribution. (though income probably isn't a normal distribution)
Is that rich?
this is how i was raised...
family income (either one parent or two working parents didnt change the number)
less than 25k poor
25k-40k below middle
40-70k middle
70-10ok upper
100-250k upper upper
250k-500k comfortable
500k-1M not quite rich but getting there
1M-5M bottom of the rich people
5M-50M rich
50M or more stinky rich.
250k a year? It's gotta be damn close...
250K is a 800k home, two average priced luxury vehicles Bmw 5 series etc, kids in private school, bwith some money left over to place in retirement...that is not rich
you lose your job at that income and you are bankrupt in a year.
rich means you can float for a very very very long time on your net income.
So you go from upper upper to comfortable? That makes no sense. Like at all.
Ok, follow my logic.
my dad makes 120k...he's upper
he is not very comfortable though.
after his mortgage, his cars, his living cost he has roughly 5 grand to put into saving because he nets about 75k a year.
thats not comfortable.
comfortable is being able to place at least 20% of your net income into saving etc and not having it imnpacet your lifestyle.
thats 3 times your salary which is conservative for a bank.
i see your point though.
my home is only 1 times my salary but i'm a cheap ass mo fo.
Say I made 250k/yr...I would have a house that costs 250-300k. I wouldn't have a 75k dollar car because that is just dumb. If I had kids, depending on where I lived, school wouldn't have to be private.