Delaware US Attorney Blocked Hunter Biden Warrants

#26
#26
AshG said:
Here's what I look for:
  • Clearly answers Who, What, When, Where, Why, and/or How in the first section of the article
  • Provides clearly delineated separation between WWWWWH, analysis, and opinion
  • Provides clear reference to primary and secondary source material
  • Provides clear method of contact for submission of corrections, additions, concerns, etc. (Comment section does not count)
  • Author is listed clearly by name or employing service
  • Does not use derogatory language, epithets, insults, pet names, insinuation, mockery, etc.
When I do go looking for news, I primarily stick with AP, Reuters, BBC World Service, and Christian Science Monitor. While no news service is perfect, these have a long-standing reputation as quality outlets and openly address when mistakes are made. They have documented chains of editorial oversight and traceable lineage of information in storage even if it is not published as part of the article or story.
Click to expand...
If those news organizations are what you claim to be credible, context to your posts condemning reporting should be added. You think that news organizations that have reported blatantly false or fake news about Russia collusion and our 2020 elections and to my knowledge have never retracted on bit of it are credible. I'll leave CSM out as I have not looked at their reporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#27
#27
Face it...Hunter is not well. He has drug and sex issues at the very least. It is a national security issue and no telling what the intelligence apparatus is dealing with and how it affects Biden's decisions
 
#28
#28
I'd be curious to know how many still believe Hunter's laptop is fake and just Russian disinformation.
 
#29
#29
Orangeburst said:
Face it...Hunter is not well. He has drug and sex issues at the very least. It is a national security issue and no telling what the intelligence apparatus is dealing with and how it affects Biden's decisions and our security
Click to expand...
I don’t give two ***** about Hunter he’s a useless crack head. But if he funneled monies to his idiot father for influence while his idiot father was a sitting VP that idiot father’s ass needs to be thrown out of his current office too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and Orangeburst
#30
#30
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t give two ***** about Hunter he’s a useless crack head. But if he funneled monies to his idiot father for influence while his idiot father was a sitting VP that idiot father’s ass needs to be thrown out of his current office too.
Click to expand...

Passionate ND..me likey.

We better care about Hunter cause I Guarantano the CCP does
 
#31
#31
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t care who appointed him. If an investigation was active and it was time to issue subpoenas they should have done so.

Hey they could have even offered the judgement at the same time and Jim Comey would nod approvingly
Click to expand...

And I don’t care what a semi-literate “engineer” - who thinks all the Supreme Court Justices sit down and collectively write majority opinions - thinks about how a US Attorney with decades of experience should do his job. (But I bet Dunning & Kruger promote you straight to senior partner.)

His appointment is significant to his (lack of) motive and how his handling of the case would have been perceived, whether you’re too dense to understand it, or not.
 
#33
#33
RockyTop85 said:
And I don’t care what a semi-literate “engineer” - who thinks all the Supreme Court Justices sit down and collectively write majority opinions - thinks about how a US Attorney with decades of experience should do his job. (But I bet Dunning & Kruger promote you straight to senior partner.)

His appointment is significant to his (lack of) motive and how his handling of the case would have been perceived, whether you’re too dense to understand it, or not.
Click to expand...
Lol… sick burn… the only thing that is important is the USA chose to play politics and it’s clear as hell today there was fire under all that smoke. What he should have done was his damn job and let the cards fall where they may.

I’ll bet he appreciates you providing a sack support for him though
 
#36
#36
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t give two ***** about Hunter he’s a useless crack head. But if he funneled monies to his idiot father for influence while his idiot father was a sitting VP that idiot father’s ass needs to be thrown out of his current office too.
Click to expand...

I say the odds are "even" this happened.
 
#37
#37
BreatheUT said:
I say the odds are "even" this happened.
Click to expand...
If it happened this is an actual impeachable offense which would disqualify the asshat idiot for the office he is in even today. Which is while it will get spiked before the mid term elections.
 
#38
#38
AshG said:
Conservative Treehouse
  • Extreme right leaning
  • Does not clearly differentiate between fact, analysis, or opinion
  • Does not provide traceable sources for most content
  • Moderate to poor reputation among other conservative news outlets
Click to expand...

Quite possibly true on all accounts, however, does that make it complete falsehood for a person with self awareness and reasoning skills ?
 
#39
#39
BreatheUT said:
I say the odds are "even" this happened.
Click to expand...

I thought Joe was somewhat a man of the people decades ago with his Amtrak rides..at least public persona..Probably just a ruse at the time, but he is just a typical long tenured corrupt politician.
I honestly believe that is why "they" hated Trump. He may or may not of been corrupt, certainly not to the levels of the DC crowd. We see it everyday..the elite and connected get preferential justice., but somehow Trump. who had business and societial dealings with these elite, all the sudden became a pariah.

That tells me all I need to know...he was an outsider as everyone wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#40
#40
JOEY'S ALL VOL !!! said:
Quite possibly true on all accounts, however, does that make it complete falsehood for a person with self awareness and reasoning skills ?
Click to expand...

Would you drink from a water fountain someone just pissed In? That's what sites like these are. And, yes, their companion sites such as Palmer Report et al.
 
#41
#41
AshG said:
Would you drink from a water fountain someone just pissed In? That's what sites like these are. And, yes, their companion sites such as Palmer Report et al.
Click to expand...
Context: This opinion is coming from someone that thinks the AP, reuters, and BBC world are credible news sources. These organizations are known to report fake news.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#42
#42
tnmarktx said:
Context: This opinion is coming from someone that thinks the AP, reuters, and BBC world are credible news sources. These organizations are known to report fake news.
Click to expand...

I'll tell you what. Direct link me (no intermediary sites) stories from any of the three sites that you feel qualify as fake news. Opinion pieces not allowed. We'll put them through the research ringer and see if the fake news determination is factual or just your bias coming through. I look forward to seeing the direct links you bring.
 
#43
#43
AshG said:
I'll tell you what. Direct link me (no intermediary sites) stories from any of the three sites that you feel qualify as fake news. Opinion pieces not allowed. We'll put them through the research ringer and see if the fake news determination is factual or just your bias coming through. I look forward to seeing the direct links you bring.
Click to expand...
Trump campaign's Russia contacts 'grave' threat, Senate says
BBC World Service - The Real Story, Trump and Russia: A Long Relationship
Mueller finds no conspiracy, but extensive Trump-Russia contacts
Anyone that has access to CSPAN to listen to the many hours of testimony and still thinks there was Russian collusion is devoid of intelligence.
 
#44
#44
tnmarktx said:
Trump campaign's Russia contacts 'grave' threat, Senate says
BBC World Service - The Real Story, Trump and Russia: A Long Relationship
Mueller finds no conspiracy, but extensive Trump-Russia contacts
Anyone that has access to CSPAN to listen to the many hours of testimony and still thinks there was Russian collusion is devoid of intelligence.
Click to expand...

The first and third links are to stories that you simply disagree with, nothing more. At no point do they provide non-factual information; the stories exist to answer WWWWWH without passing judgment. Both stories can be summed up as "The following people say the following things:"

The BBC link is to an editorial entertainment program on the BBC's television/radio arm, not a wire story from World Service.

Try again.
 
#46
#46
AshG said:
The first and third links are to stories that you simply disagree with, nothing more. At no point do they provide non-factual information; the stories exist to answer WWWWWH without passing judgment. Both stories can be summed up as "The following people say the following things:"

The BBC link is to an editorial entertainment program on the BBC's television/radio arm, not a wire story from World Service.

Try again.
Click to expand...
Deny all you want. I provided the links to your credible organizations reporting on fake news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#50
#50
AshG said:
Your definition is subjective. I am providing objective criterion. You fail to meet the challenge.
Click to expand...
You know I’ve got a feeling no matter what is presented it won’t be “good enough” and I’m amazed you got him to nibble at your stink bait here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top