Delaware US Attorney Blocked Hunter Biden Warrants

#51
#51
AshG said:
Your definition is subjective. I am providing objective criterion. You fail to meet the challenge.
Click to expand...
context: This is an opinion of someone that advocates news sources that spread baseless lies, yet deems them as credible.
Because of the context I'll disregard your statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#54
#54
NorthDallas40 said:
You know I’ve got a feeling no matter what is presented it won’t be “good enough” and I’m amazed you got him to nibble at your stink bait here.
Click to expand...

I've provided objectively attainable criterion. He's either incapable of meeting this very simple challenge or, likely, just doesn't understand the very basic differences. I'm guessing the latter at this point.
 
#57
#57
AshG said:
I've provided objectively attainable criterion. He's either incapable of meeting this very simple challenge or, likely, just doesn't understand the very basic differences. I'm guessing the latter at this point.
Click to expand...
context: I'm AshG! I'm the smartest person on VN!
 
#60
#60
tnmarktx said:
What are you going to do about it?
Click to expand...

Me? Nothing. Maybe sit back and smile. Wait for your diagram of the article you posted that proves it falls under editorial guise instead of WWWWWWH reporting.

I've got some hot tea in front of me and Rolling Stones on my stereo. It's a good evening.
 
#61
#61
AshG said:
Describe how.

How about you diagram the sections of one of the articles you complained about. Here you go.
Mueller finds no conspiracy, but extensive Trump-Russia contacts
Click to expand...
The whole report gave credence to the Russian collusion story. If they did more investigative journalism, maybe they would have reported on the fake dossier and how the sub source had admitted it was fake. Maybe it would have reported about the misconduct of the FBI. You know actual credible news..
 
#62
#62
tnmarktx said:
The whole report gave credence to the Russian collusion story. If they did more investigative journalism, maybe they would have reported on the fake dossier and how the sub source had admitted it was fake. Maybe it would have reported about the misconduct of the FBI. You know actual credible news..
Click to expand...

That's you, opining. Diagram please.
 
#63
#63
AshG said:
Me? Nothing. Maybe sit back and smile. Wait for your diagram of the article you posted that proves it falls under editorial guise instead of WWWWWWH reporting.

I've got some hot tea in front of me and Rolling Stones on my stereo. It's a good evening.
Click to expand...
I could care less. I figure my fake news is just as good as yours. You're just more of a pompous a$$ than I am. Enjoy your rolling stones, maybe I'll put on some ganster rap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#64
#64
tnmarktx said:
I could care less. I figure my fake news is just as good as yours. You're just more of a pompous ass than I am. Enjoy your rolling stones, maybe I'll put on some ganster rap.
Click to expand...

You could care less? So why don't you?

What's your specific objective criterion for judging the quality of information you read?
 
#65
#65
AshG said:
I've provided objectively attainable criterion. He's either incapable of meeting this very simple challenge or, likely, just doesn't understand the very basic differences. I'm guessing the latter at this point.
Click to expand...
This would have been my reply.

E0EC4184-A536-474B-A4C6-F29AB84E458B.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#66
#66
AshG said:
You could care less? So why don't you?

What's your specific objective criterion for judging the quality of information you read?
Click to expand...
I research everything continually. I've spent over 20 years solving problems in my line of work. The best thing I've learned is to never discount anything. It's the people that think they know it all that are doomed to fail at life. At some point every know it all fails. So you keep right on dictating to everyone what they should believe and what news sources are real. Enjoy your hot tea and rolling stones. I'll set back and enjoy my glass of water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and W.TN.Orange Blood
#70
#70
tnmarktx said:
I could care less. I figure my fake news is just as good as yours. You're just more of a pompous a$$ than I am. Enjoy your rolling stones, maybe I'll put on some ganster rap.
Click to expand...

How much less?

Do you ever get tired of being mocked?
 
#73
#73
tnmarktx said:
I research everything continually. I've spent over 20 years solving problems in my line of work. The best thing I've learned is to never discount anything. It's the people that think they know it all that are doomed to fail at life. At some point every know it all fails. So you keep right on dictating to everyone what they should believe and what news sources are real. Enjoy your hot tea and rolling stones. I'll set back and enjoy my glass of water.
Click to expand...

That's good for me then, because I have a solid handle on the fact that I know practically nothing in the grand scheme of things. I am just confident in the very few things I do know.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top