If it was released by someone in the UTAD, I would eliminate it coming from Hamilton just based on this quote...
I can't imagine Hamilton wanting to leak this and make himself look weak or wanting to highlight an instance where he is put in his place.
If I had to guess the source of this leak, I am putting my money on a guy that I think has been leaking information for at least 4 years. It would have to be someone that has had intimate knowledge of that program over the entire time that we've had 3 new coaches in football, knowledge of the Pearl and Kiffin allegations, and someone who would have access to all of the key players...
It's David Blackburn.
Yep, my money's on him. :good!:If it was released by someone in the UTAD, I would eliminate it coming from Hamilton just based on this quote...
I can't imagine Hamilton wanting to leak this and make himself look weak or wanting to highlight an instance where he is put in his place.
If I had to guess the source of this leak, I am putting my money on a guy that I think has been leaking information for at least 4 years. It would have to be someone that has had intimate knowledge of that program over the entire time that we've had 3 new coaches in football, knowledge of the Pearl and Kiffin allegations, and someone who would have access to all of the key players...
It's David Blackburn.
Using reason and rational thinking with University of Pearl supporters never works. They still think their hero introduced the game of basketball to UT and that it never existed before Pearl.
How's this for reason and rational thinking? In the long and storied history of UT basketball, how many coaching records has Bruce set?
Another coach may come in and do as good or better, but to not recognize BP has surpassed our coaching lineage is just ignoring facts.
How's this for reason and rational thinking? In the long and storied history of UT basketball, how many coaching records has Bruce set?
Another coach may come in and do as good or better, but to not recognize that BP has raised the bar above any of our coaching lineage is just ignoring facts.
So was the scotus ruling based on NCAA being the voluntary governing body of the member schools ? Seems that would be a factor in how or whether the schools have much 'fight back' capability.
They essentially 'give' the NCAA power to rule them. aka GORT
In final analysis, the question is whether "the conduct allegedly causing the deprivation of a federal right [can] be fairly attributable to the State." Lugar, 457 U.S. at 457 U. S. 937. It would be ironic indeed to conclude that the NCAA's imposition of sanctions against UNLV -- sanctions that UNLV and its counsel, including the Attorney General of Nevada, steadfastly opposed during protracted adversary proceedings -- is fairly attributable to the State of Nevada. It would be more appropriate to conclude that UNLV has conducted its athletic program under color of the policies adopted by the NCAA, rather than that those policies were developed and enforced under color of Nevada law.
The judgment of the Nevada Supreme Court is reversed, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Contrary to the premise of the Nevada Supreme Court's opinion, the NCAA did not -- indeed, could not -- directly discipline Tarkanian or any other state university employee. [Footnote 18] The express
Page 488 U. S. 198
terms of the Confidential Report did not demand the suspension unconditionally; rather, it requested "the University . . . to show cause" why the NCAA should not impose additional penalties if UNLV declines to suspend Tarkanian. App. 180. Even the university's vice-president acknowledged that the Report gave the University options, other than suspension: UNLV could have retained Tarkanian and risked additional sanctions, perhaps even expulsion from the NCAA, or it could have withdrawn voluntarily from the Association
But I also found it interesting that they relied on this type of rationale to get to their holding:
So the NCAA can't directly discipline a state employee, but it can tell the state itself that they need to discipline the state employee, with the only other option being to withdraw from the NCAA. I would go ahead and call that questionable. There was a dissenting opinion. I would have dissented if I were on the SCOTUS. Alas, I was not and am not.
Good Lord. You can measure the success of the next coach against Mears while the rest of us will use Pearl as the measuring stick.
Then, the "rest of you" don't operate in reality. To say that Pearl has far surpassed any other coach here simply isn't true.
Take your blinders off. You are absolutely wrong. He has.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I don't know that it would be categorized as an out and out lie, but he clearly didn't tell compliance about it when it happened and there's evidence that the interaction was longer than he said it was.
He said he didn't know it was a violation. I don't know if he is lying, but he has little credibility at this point on the subject.