I'm grateful to you
@volfanbill for insisting that I show you stills. I decided to look further and look at this!
---
Below. F must be pissed because he looks immediately to punch the kid. He looks straight at the kid (who some falsely claim blindsided F
) and balls his fist to punch him.
Simultaneously he raises a forearm. The kid is looking off to his right. (As I showed in an earlier post, F has been looking straight at the kid for a while as he walked toward him. He did this instead of running off the court.) And note: The kid (fan) has plenty of room to pass by F, if F had not subsequently moved into the kid's path. F also clearly has plenty of room on the left to dodge the fan. F could even to stand still and avoid contact.
View attachment 623059
Below. F continues to stare the kid down, appearing ready to use a punch and forearm shiver as the kid moves nearer. The kid is still not looking at F. F is going to blindside the kid.
View attachment 623060
Below. Now the kid finally sees F. F has meanwhile
positioned himself in front of the kid with a foot and with his fist still balled. Now the kid can no longer get around F. And he can't stop. The kid's body language is non threatening. He looks like he raises his index finger in the #1 sign.
View attachment 623062
Below. F now leans toward the kid with his upper body and completely blocks the kid's way by raising his foot. F
clearly intends to cause a collision. He has made it unavoidable. He intends to trip the kid.
View attachment 623068
Below: F trips the kid intentionally. The kid never makes contact with F -- except for being on the receiving end of F's extended arms, shoving the tripped kid to the hardwood. The kid absolutely did not run into F. It was the other way around. The kid absolutely did not blindside F. It's clear beyond every shadow of a doubt.
View attachment 623069
Below: Now this is
sad. As a result of F deliberately tripping a kid running at speed, in the tangle up that F initiated completely on his own, F may have injured his own knee and/or ankle by the force of contact and the twisting action that the helpless kid's falling body occasioned. Tripping the kid put F off balance, and F may also or otherwise have accidentally injured himself by landing awkwardly on the ankle he used to sweep the kid's legs and shove the kid to the floor. F's injuries, if he is injured, are 100% self inflicted.
View attachment 623070
View attachment 623071
---
In summary, F saw the fan. F walked directly to the fan. F failed to avoid the fan by merely standing still or by making use of all the open space to his left. F balled his fist and raised a forearm in preparation for the collision before the fan ever saw F. F wholly initiated the collision. F used his lower leg -- knee and ankle -- to intentionally sweep the running kid's legs, and shoved the kid to the hardwood with his arms.
Some "martyr" this guy makes. Disgusting.
As an added bonus, I also provide you with clear evidence that F had two different routes to run off the court, instead of stalking this kid and looking to "make a point." See also the path of a different Duke player, further from the Duke bench and nearer to the onrushing fans, who successfully ran off court. He apparently wanted to flee any contact and get to the locker room. The difference seems to be that F was angry and wanted to make the someone pay. If F injured his knee and/or ankle, it was the clear result of his own reckless and violent actions.
View attachment 623072
---
Btw, I have never said "Filipowski got what he deserved." I think that is a bad thread title. I don't even know what it is supposed to mean. Does it mean did F deserve to trip the kid and throw him to the ground? Does it mean did he deserve to be a
cause celebre and martyr? I'm not interested in all that. I just wanted to see for myself what happened. I'm baffled by the antagonism.