Did The Feds just admit to having a gun registry?

#151
#151
Rasputin_Vol said:
Honestly... no BS. Are the majority of the tickets and citations written more reflective of the case you presented or is it more reflective of incidents far less dangerous like I have presented? Using your experience and those other officers around you. Are you more likely to see citations written for trivial infractions or the scenario you illustrated?
Click to expand...

What? An infraction is an infraction. Generally safety related.

I see you're avoiding answering the question I put out earlier. Of course, it doesn't surprise me. You refuse to answer questions when backed in a corner and try to divert the attention away from the fact you just got cornered.

Now go away.
 
#153
#153
Grand Vol said:
So you do obey some laws without griping?

:p
Click to expand...

Actually, I've never stated I didn't want laws. It's rulers that I have the problem with. Their ability to arbitrarily inflict their perceived authority over others is a major concern for a free humanity.

Yeah, we pretty much all have to obey ole Newtons laws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#154
#154
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Actually, I've never stated I didn't want laws. It's rulers that I have the problem with. Their ability to arbitrarily inflict their perceived authority over others is a major concern for a free humanity.

Yeah, we pretty much all have to obey ole Newtons laws.
Click to expand...

Interesting. I tended to stop some drivers from attempting what would have been spectacular tests of Newton's Laws.

So not all the laws I enforced (or kept from being enforced) were made by the ruling elite.
 
#155
#155
Grand Vol said:
Interesting. I tended to stop some drivers from attempting what would have been spectacular tests of Newton's Laws.

So not all the laws I enforced (or kept from being enforced) were made by the ruling elite.
Click to expand...

Just clarifying my position here.
 
#157
#157
Grand Vol said:
What? An infraction is an infraction. Generally safety related.

I see you're avoiding answering the question I put out earlier. Of course, it doesn't surprise me. You refuse to answer questions when backed in a corner and try to divert the attention away from the fact you just got cornered.

Now go away.
Click to expand...

What question?
 
#159
#159
My understanding is don't know what you bought. Just that you bought one.

Long gun
Shotgun
Pistol.

Is this not the case?
 
#160
#160
By the way, anybody else see the irony that GOPers are screaming about ndividual rights of terrorists to buy guns, and screeching about gun registries, but are perfectly at ease with registries based on religion ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#162
#162
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
No, the insurance company wouldn't pay in this instance. I'm sure if you look at the fine print of your policy it says as much.

I just fail to see what locking someone up or fining them gains. Hurt is hopefully healed, and dead is dead. I don't see how any of this is the governments business.
I guess it comes down to intent, they didn't intend to kill or hurt the child. Were they negligent? Sure. Still can't go with jail time for a traffic accident though.
Click to expand...

Say what?
 
#164
#164
lawgator1 said:
By the way, anybody else see the irony that GOPers are screaming about ndividual rights of terrorists to buy guns, and screeching about gun registries, but are perfectly at ease with registries based on religion ?
Click to expand...
Like requiring a photo I.D. to get into the Democratic Convention, but not to vote?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#169
#169
Carl Pickens said:
What were you referring to with regard to what insurance would not pay?
Click to expand...

It was hypothetical stuff about kids and car seats and whether they should be required under penalty of law. And, would the insurance company pay out if the child wasn't restrained.
 
#170
#170
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
I'm an anarchist/abolitionist which means I oppose all forms of human slavery. Which forms do you oppose?

My alternative? A voluntary society with peaceful people participating in free market trade of products and ideas.
Click to expand...

I oppose involuntary bondage too, but don't collate government of some type and the taxes pursuant with slavery. That would include devolving many of our pyramid scheme social programs and those that generate generational dependency, but recognizing a limited national and state government are pretty good models that require the citizenry value liberty enough to keep them in check. I think humans are predominantly communal animals that eventually recognize some people have rare qualities of vision and execution, and voluntarily look to those people when solutions evade pedestrian minds, thus always evoking a government in some form.
 
#171
#171
lawgator1 said:
By the way, anybody else see the irony that GOPers are screaming about ndividual rights of terrorists to buy guns, and screeching about gun registries, but are perfectly at ease with registries based on religion ?
Click to expand...

Yes, if that were actually the case rather than hyperbole.

No one is arguing terrorists should be able to buy guns, but that - unless you consider Sen. TKennedy to be a terrorist, for example - simply appearing on a list due to arbitrary criteria is not grounds for deprivation. (Though discrimination based upon religion is decidedly ironic).

I did notice a Democrat - or person of the left - excoriating Republicans for protecting the rights of persons convicted of nothing but appearing on the same list as Ted Kennedy once did.

Waitaminnit...that was you! :) My, duplicity surplus is driving up the price of intellectual consistency...
 
#175
#175
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
That would be here, dear sir.
Click to expand...

No, that is not a love it or leave invitation. Not in my repetoire.

Edit: I do understand how you might perceive it that way, though. Inflection's a tough one via internet.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top