NIL was part of the test, so I see it as no NIL (labor market), no case. 'those decisions were grounded in a pre-NIL world.” He added rules in those cases were “designed to keep commercial interests out of college sports” whereas in an NIL world, college athletes are unambiguously engaged in commercial transactions with the NCAA’s blessing.
Campbell also reasoned that, based on a review of Pavia’s evidence, it appears the “challenged eligibility rules harm competition.” The judge noted that former JUCO players lose the chance to enjoy the same amount of time in the NCAA D-1 labor market compared to players who only attend D-1 schools. That means former JUCO players lose out on “competitive advantages and NIL compensation” especially since D-1 offers “significant advantages over junior college football.” Campbell highlighted “more exposure, potentially better competition and coaching, and financial advantages due to the NIL opportunities disproportionately offered to Division I athletes” as key advantages.
So no JUCO player has played in a comparable NIL market as D1 players, it is that simply. If JUCO playing time doesn't count against eligible is fine with me.