The Impeachment Thread

[Stew Cook]

So, you want me to trust his hearsay and your political wishes. Tell me again the difference between "you will, because..." And " i heard Trump would... "

All without being to hear or read the actual testimony.

A good deal of these so-called leaks are actually from released prepared opening statements.

See if this works:

Taylor Opening Statement

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

And forgot to tell the Ukrainians..worst Quid Pro Quo in history....so bad of one that it's not even defined as one

Y'all are gonna rile up BB85 so much now he won't be seeing straight for a week or two....

 

[BowlBrother85]

And forgot to tell the Ukrainians..worst Quid Pro Quo in history....so bad of one that it's not even defined as one

What Bill Taylor described today, was most definitely a quid-pro-quo policy from Donald Trump. Trump had withheld Congressionally authorized military aid. He would only release it when Ukraine announced investigations into the Bidens and the 2016 election that would help his reelection chances. That is as quid-pro-quo as it gets.

 

[tvolsfan]

It's telling that Jordan's tweets today have said nothing positive about how this testimony looks for Trump. Just complaining about the process.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

What Bill Taylor described today, was most definitely a quid-pro-quo policy from Donald Trump. Trump had withheld Congressionally authorized military aid. He would only release it when Ukraine announced investigations into the Bidens and the 2016 election that would help his reelection chances. That is as quid-pro-quo as it gets.

uh-huh.....you trying to make points or something w/the loony side?

 

[VolnJC]

What are you talking about? Really, You're just babbling at this point.

Lol I guess you don't understand how Quid pro Quos work...see it takes two sides to agree if one side knows nothing about it then it's not a Quid pro quo I could probably draw you a pic if that would help

 

[Mick]

Lol I guess you don't understand how Quid pro Quos work...see it takes two sides to agree if one side knows nothing about it then it's not a Quid pro quo I could probably draw you a pic if that would help

Which of Trump's crimes are you trying to defend at this point? Is it Quid pro quo isn't a crime? Is it Trump didn't abuse his office? Is it that Trump wasn't engaged in campaign finance violations by trying to extort a foreign country?

 

[evillawyer]

New evidence hints at a Justice Department coverup

 

[VolnJC]

Which of Trump's crimes are you trying to defend at this point? Is it Quid pro quo isn't a crime? Is it Trump didn't abuse his office? Is it that Trump wasn't engaged in campaign finance violations by trying to extort a foreign country?

They got their money and never knew about the conditions... And remember he has a right to ask about investigation s they colluded to interfere in an election so you are okay with interference as long as it benefits your side apparently

 

[VolnJC]

This is exactly what this is all about...the Dems have arguably the worst candidates in recent history..so bad they are thinking about asking Hilary to run and lose for the 3rd time

 

[lawgator1]

They got their money and never knew about the conditions... And remember he has a right to ask about investigation s they colluded to interfere in an election so you are okay with interference as long as it benefits your side apparently

And we're back to the Crime Stoppers theory.

 

[Mick]

They got their money and never knew about the conditions... And remember he has a right to ask about investigation s they colluded to interfere in an election so you are okay with interference as long as it benefits your side apparently

There are proper channels for investigating American citizen, telling Ukraine to investigate our citizens is not one of them.

 

[VolnJC]

And we're back to the Crime Stoppers theory.

I'd much rather be on that side than the side that has been confirmed to have reached out to Ukraine to dig up dirt on a Presidential candidate

 

[hjeagle1vol]

They got their money and never knew about the conditions... And remember he has a right to ask about investigation s they colluded to interfere in an election so you are okay with interference as long as it benefits your side apparently

Not just a right but a constitutional obligation to we the people and an agreement between the two countries. They always forget Uke has been trying to deliver evidence since 2017 but the corrupt ambassador blocked visas of the ones trying to bring it to DC

 

[Mick]

And we're back to the Crime Stoppers theory.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

New evidence hints at a Justice Department coverup

All hearsay & conjecture....fake news .....getting Dim hopes up again.

 

[VolnJC]

There are proper channels for investigating American citizen, telling Ukraine to investigate our citizens is not one of them.

You mean like Brennan or Clapper's minions? How do they investigate themselves?

 

[Hunerwadel]

Is he playing 3-D chess?

Overused meaningless term on forums. Soon to join snowflake and others.

 

[Mick]

You mean like Brennan or Clapper's minions? How do they investigate themselves?

Who are the Brennan and Clapper minions And you still don't get another country to investigate them?

 

[Orange_Crush]

There are proper channels for investigating American citizen, telling Ukraine to investigate our citizens is not one of them.

You're back to that broken logic that the Ukraine shouldn't investigate what happens in the Ukraine? I hate to break it to you, but that's incorrect.

 

[VolnJC]

Who are the Brennan and Clapper minions And you still don't get another country to investigate them?

The Whistleblower was State department then CIA he was accused of leaking early on the Ukraine Ambassador denied Visas to prosecutor's who were trying to deliver evidence from 2016...she also spied on conservative journalists looking into the investigation
Judicial Watch Believes The State Dept Spied On Conservative Journalists And Trump Allies

 

[Mick]

The Whistleblower was State department then CIA he was accused of leaking early on the Ukraine Ambassador denied Visas to prosecutor's who were trying to deliver evidence from 2016...she also spied on conservative journalists looking into the investigation
Judicial Watch Believes The State Dept Spied On Conservative Journalists And Trump Allies

"Judicial Watch Believes"? Ole Tom at it again or is it someone else writing this? Didn't click.

 

[FallCreekVols]

Congressman John Radcliff was a questioner in the room with Taylor. He has just publicly stated that Taylor “had strong opinions on Trump’s approach to foreign policy but neither Taylor, nor any other witness so far has presented any evidence of quid pro quo.”

 

[Hunerwadel]

The Whistleblower was State department then CIA he was accused of leaking early on the Ukraine Ambassador denied Visas to prosecutor's who were trying to deliver evidence from 2016...she also spied on conservative journalists looking into the investigation
Judicial Watch Believes The State Dept Spied On Conservative Journalists And Trump Allies

You pea brains really buy into this nonsense?

 

[FallCreekVols]

Are you libs naive or ignorant enough not to know that countries routinely demand certain behavior, cooperation, support etc in exchange for foreign aid??? Do you expect any country to just fork over cash to anyone without reason?