Don't be blinded by today's performance

For what? I still didn't say THIS year would be a good or even acceptable year if we don't get a bid. This year and his first year are two completely different years.

You said people said this year would be a good year if we win 20 games but no bid. No one has said that or thinks that.

There have been numerous people make that statement.
 
The problem with bringing him back is you have to extend him. If you extend him and you can him next year, you're in the same boat buyout wise. If you don't think he's the future, you've got to let him go this year.

From what I've heard he may leave on his own anyway.

God, I hope so.:)
 
I've seen many posts on different threads that state 20 +wins and not going to the tourney is still a good year. While I have argued any year without an NCAA tourney bid is a failed year. BTO, I know you have seen this discussed before.

No, I honestly haven't seen one person say "This year 20 wins and the NIT is a good year".
 
The problem with bringing him back is you have to extend him. If you extend him and you can him next year, you're in the same boat buyout wise. If you don't think he's the future, you've got to let him go this year.

From what I've heard he may leave on his own anyway.

So if he leaves on his own accord, we don't have to pay the buyout, correct? Remember reading that somewhere or maybe I dreamed it.:crazy:
 
The truth is if we don't hire Pearl it will be more like 20 till we are relevant again.

20 years until we're relevant against in basketball if we don't hire Bruce Pearl. Those are the only two options. Hire Bruce Pearl, or two decades of nothing but NIT for us. That... I can't even.... it's just not...

This word "know" that you use in your handle. I do not think it means what you think it means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top