gardners_51609
Get Heuped Up!
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2011
- Messages
- 2,316
- Likes
- 332
I think that brings on a debate.
I disagree that it's not as much about location, as it is about reputation.
I for instance think that it's great that we're playing Oklahoma. Why? Not because I think we need to recruit more in Oklahoma, but because recruits recognize Oklahoma as a respected brand in college football. We will be measured by how well we do against Oklahoma.
When a recruit sees us beat a "National Power" or even come close to beating a "National Power," then we automatically have something that is attention-garnering, and indicative of where we're heading.
If we have that, I dont' think it matters where we play. If we can establish that winning brand again, doors will open to recruit's homes in every single part of the country.
I agree. I guess I was just looking at the potential of us owning the region. But we already seem to do pretty well in Virginia and NC. The kids in those states seem to be very loyal to their home schools. I use to think Tenn kids hated staying at home until Butch got here now I think our kids like to stay home too. Which means we do not have to go as far to fill every spot in our class, just a few we like out of state.