CSpindizzy
Five Star Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2005
- Messages
- 11,352
- Likes
- 542
Had two things happened the outcome of the game could have been different and the "HateAinge" crowd wouldn't be on the radar:
1)The offensive line given better protection. ND's defense is NOT that good overall but yet they got inside and put plenty of pressure on Ainge on numerous occassions.
2)Had the receivers caught those balls that were outright catchable and even half of those that were "highlight reel" plays, Ainge's confidence would have gone up, we would have gone down the field and scored more points, and perhaps some of the resulting mistakes would not have happened.
What I don't understand from the "hateAinge" crowd is that it is and has been wrong to talk bad of Clausen but those same people are trashing Ainge.
Clausen has seen two great systems on offense, both LSU and UT. He has played numerous games and has learned from his brother as well. In theory there is no excuse for Clausen not to be prepared. Ainge has seen a mediocre offensive system of Sanders, little playing time with "you're as good as starting, well maybe not, well maybe so", and this is only his second year.
He's not perfect. We dealt with Casey's lackluster performance along with the Dog Faced Gremlin of his brother Rick. Give Ainge a break and let him prove us right or wrong with the same chance every other QB in our history has seen.
As a matter of fact, if you have better ideas of how Ainge should play, train, or prepare since he IS our starting QB, please call the office and let CPF hear your thoughts. I'm sure he'd love to hear from you.
1)The offensive line given better protection. ND's defense is NOT that good overall but yet they got inside and put plenty of pressure on Ainge on numerous occassions.
2)Had the receivers caught those balls that were outright catchable and even half of those that were "highlight reel" plays, Ainge's confidence would have gone up, we would have gone down the field and scored more points, and perhaps some of the resulting mistakes would not have happened.
What I don't understand from the "hateAinge" crowd is that it is and has been wrong to talk bad of Clausen but those same people are trashing Ainge.
Clausen has seen two great systems on offense, both LSU and UT. He has played numerous games and has learned from his brother as well. In theory there is no excuse for Clausen not to be prepared. Ainge has seen a mediocre offensive system of Sanders, little playing time with "you're as good as starting, well maybe not, well maybe so", and this is only his second year.
He's not perfect. We dealt with Casey's lackluster performance along with the Dog Faced Gremlin of his brother Rick. Give Ainge a break and let him prove us right or wrong with the same chance every other QB in our history has seen.
As a matter of fact, if you have better ideas of how Ainge should play, train, or prepare since he IS our starting QB, please call the office and let CPF hear your thoughts. I'm sure he'd love to hear from you.