I will probably be corrected, but I don't recall seeing any starting point guards on top 25 teams that were smaller than her. She might not be the smallest but I think she is on that edge of the spectrum. And I don't completely trust UCONN's assessment of her height.Actually, Moriah Jefferson isn't all that small. She is carried on the UConn roster as 5'7".
Jim
Jefferson is much longer and quicker than Dangerfield, no comparison. She also was a much better high school player who carried her club team, had great court vision and made the other players around her better.
Dangerfield played on a stacked team, took bad shots and had too many turnovers for a PG, she will be difficult to hide on defense with bigger players in college.
Jefferson is closer to 5' 7" and Dangerfield is closer to 5' 2" LOL. Big difference in length and anticipation skills, also setting team up and not looking for her own shot. The guards were lacking this year when USA basically left off Cooper. Everyone at try outs thought that was bogus.
Can you explain? Are you writing that the selection committee picks a team, and then someone or someones pick other people to officially be on the team? If so, who makes the changes?Having known several members of selection committee members over the years, I know that what they choose and what is actually done are 2 different things. You are naive if you think otherwise.
The committee picks a team and then picks other complimentary players that would fill out the other needed spots. They are what they recommend. That does not mean that all those players end up in the final 12. There is a lot more that goes into the final announcement and those decisions are not made by the committee.
Everyone I spoke to had the same impression as I did that Dangerfield would not have been in the final 12 or close to it. She put up a ton of missed shots and made bad decisions. As an example, the committee would not have seen Durr, so how could they put her in the final 12!
The other glaring observation was the special treatment given by both Staley and Walz to their own players and those they were recruiting. They were so obvious that the committee members were all very pissed off about the situation. Probably why some much information has been discussed.
And yet there was no special treatment for Holly's players and her recruits? I would think that if what you say is valid then preference would also have been given to Cooper.
Linkster,just for your information,Te'a Cooper did not try out for the team that Holly helped coach.That would make your point meaningless in this instance.
You are absolutely right. But I wasn't the one accusing USA basketball of playing favorites. I'd like to know exactly who was responsible for keeping Cooper off the team and why. I don't like posters making accusations against coaches and then not naming names and sources. Who felt there was favoritism? And what are their prejudices? There are people in AAU ball and among the media that favor certain programs and/or promote players who have gone through their system. They could just as easily be favoring Cooper.
And if favoritism was in play I would have expected that both Staley and Walz would have played Cox a lot more since at the time they were still both pursuing her. And yet she sat most of the tournament, with only Anigwe playing less, while Dangerfield, who had already verballed to a rival team saw lots of floor time.
These are some of the top coaches in the country who donate their time to USA basketball when they could be travelling the country recruiting or enjoying the limited free time they get all year. If one is going to impugn their motives and their integrity it should be backed up with more than vague references to "everyone I talked to".
When I look at who sits on the board of USA basketball I see lots of folks associated with the pro game and not many from the NCAA or AAU. Those people are interested in developing the national team and IMO they pick developmental teams with an eye toward who has the potential to play at that level in the future and also who has shown a commitment to USA ball over the years. I have no idea who is the better player between Cooper and Dangerfield but Dangerfield was on a USA roster as far back as 2013 while I don't see Cooper's name anywhere.
The fact that there has been so much chatter about this year should raise red flags.
The conflict of interest going on is rampant which can be easily seen when Davis and Gray ended up at South Carolina after try outs.
Just because Cox didn't play doesn't mean that she wasn't favored and placed on the team over players like Mompremier, Brown, who did better at try outs than Cox.
For your information Uconner, Cooper was named to the U17 team, Dangerfield was not!
The only place I've read much at all that the selections were biased is here.
That's quite a leap. And it may be that they just saw their best interests in transferring to SC.
One could also say that DeShields was recovering from surgery, contributed nothing to the team and only got a free trip to Korea because Holly was a coach. I think that is also a huge leap and untrue. How many players over the years attended Pat's summer camps and then signed on with Tenn? Are we to assume there was illegal recruiting going on? Of course not, but a biased person might think that to be the case.
And were you at the tryouts? What is your basis for saying she was outplayed?
I based that on seeing a USA all-time roster. I must have been looking at another list because I checked the U-17 list and Dangerfield wasn't on the team but I don't see Cooper listed either. Here's a link to the U17 all-time roster. USA Women's FIBA U17 World Championship Team All-Time Alphabetical Roster