golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,668
Barnett played 34% more snaps than Allen despite Allen playing an extra game.
and Allen played on loaded team and had all types of help. Barnett had to do all the work himself. for instance Bama's two turnovers against us were both by Barnett, FF and interception.
Bama's DBs don't fall down and can cover keeping the ball in the QBs hands. Bama's LB's can contain and pressure flushing people back to Allen. Barnett had neither of those.
The flipside to that argument is that Barnett had no one else on his line to steal his stats.
If Allen played at UT and Barnett played at Bama then Barnett would have won, probably would have had a few more sacks too.
If Allen played at UT and Barnett played at Bama then Barnett would have won, probably would have had a few more sacks too.
lets put is this way do you think Allen would have produced as much as DB if you flipped their teams? I would say DBs stats get dumb playing for Bama. dumb as in a lot more production from the nations most productive DE.
But see, therein lies the issue.
I said before the TSIO that if someone wanted to argue that Barnett would be the best player on the field I wouldn't say a word against it. I still mean that. Barnett is an incredible talent.
But, fair or unfair, a player on the 109th ranked defense is not going to win any POY awards.
Why not though? It's PLAYER of the year awards, not TEAM awards.
Because stats alone don't tell the story.
As an example, AJ Johnson led the SEC in tackles in 2012. The defense he played on was the football equivalent of a flaming bag of dog crap on Derek Dooley's front porch. Did Johnson's stats make him the best defensive player, or even the best linebacker, in the SEC?
Not sure this is helpful for your argument. If Allen goes before Barnett in the draft, does that lend legitimacy to this award?
Disagree with the former but agree with the latter.
Just a heads up, I have a feeling you're going to have disagreements with some of the all-conference teams that are starting to come out.
I'm sure I will but oh well. It's political and has nothing to do with who the best players are.
Edit: How did Allen have a better year?
The good news is that Barnett's on pretty much all of them.
ETA: Allen was the the leader of, and best player on, the best defense in the country. He was great against the pass, and unbeatable against the run. He also has two touchdowns.
Is Allen better than Barnett?
At the beginning of the season would you have traded Allen for Barnett if it were possible?
If you looked directly at the stats and removed the names and teams 10 times out of 10 anyone would choose Barnett.
Do you not think it is advantageous for a player to play on the best defense in the country and quite possibly of all time?
How do you think Barnett would perform on that defense when teams wouldn't have the luxury of double and triple teaming him?
This is my problem with Alabama fans. I live in AL and even attended Auburn University, so I've had plenty of discussions with the Tide faithful and 99% of the time their fans lack the ability to be objective even on something small.