OrangeInKy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Messages
- 8,444
- Likes
- 10,457
The image of Tn basketball wouldn't be relevant without the success Pearl brought it. If this conversation was occuring about Buzz ... wouldn't matter. There would be no program image to damage. Pearl is a victim of his own success.
This post. Even with the struggles this year, we should make our 6th consecutive tourney appearance. That is a school record if I'm not mistaken.
I don't think the violations impacted the outcome of the games unless you count the distraction of it all this year. Although unethical in nature I don't think it affected recruiting either. Two players in question took their cookout hotdogs and went else where. But either way life goes on. Not anything I can do about it so why worry ?...just my .02 cents worth
Haha. Only problem is UConn just got a slap on wrist because they "showed" NCAA by firing coaches. You don't think UConn gets hit harder if they held onto all coaches involved? Not a matter of what you and I like. You saying "that's the way it is" settles nothing. I doubt UT will check your posts before deciding. Fact of the matter is what you just wrote is directly wrong according to UConn case.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
If it was Jim Calhoun, they wouldn't have fired him. My point is, which you agree with I think, is that short of a show cause Pearl is here to stay. I think that's the right move and whether the haters like it or not, that is likely the way it is. UConn had a scapegoat, we do not. If we could have, we would have. It's a business and that's end of story. We had a great coach here who ran a superbly clean program and graduated his players very well. He won about 5 games a year and was canned. I keep hearing everyone talk about our "image" being tarnished. With that coach we were assured of having a stellar image for UT as long as he was here. It's about wins and everyone knows that. He has the best winning percentage of all SEC coaches in the last 5 years.
If it was Jim Calhoun, they wouldn't have fired him. My point is, which you agree with I think, is that short of a show cause Pearl is here to stay. I think that's the right move and whether the haters like it or not, that is likely the way it is. UConn had a scapegoat, we do not. If we could have, we would have. It's a business and that's end of story. We had a great coach here who ran a superbly clean program and graduated his players very well. He won about 5 games a year and was canned. I keep hearing everyone talk about our "image" being tarnished. With that coach we were assured of having a stellar image for UT as long as he was here. It's about wins and everyone knows that. He has the best winning percentage of all SEC coaches in the last 5 years.