Manning was another QB with big numbers. Woodson led his team to the national title by shutting down half the field and making big plays.
Given Michigan's bowl record lately, I would agree. As for the season in general, I doubt anyone was really more valuable. I'm not sure if you can find numbers for the receivers he was guarding, but he definitely was a great cornerback.
I just found this link....he had 42 tackles and 7int's on defense...and on offense he had a staggering 231 receiving yards. I completely agree with you now...those are definitely the stats of the 11th greatest player in college football history. I dont know what I was thinking.
CNN/SI - College Football - Heisman Watch - Charles Woodson
did you read that, how aboutFor the season, Woodson was in on 765 plays: 613 on defense, 69 on offense, and 83 on special teams
in reference to the season ending win against OSU that vaulted Michigan to the Rose Bowl and a share of the NC. If you watched that game, which I did, Woodson's play won Michigan the game, period.He returned a punt 78 yards for a touchdown and he stopped a fourth quarter OSU scoring threat by intercepting a pass in the end zone.
Emainvol...do you honestly think he deserved the Heisman trophy?
Considering the competition that year, I can see why he won it. I don't necessarily like giving the Heisman to a defensive player, but he made a pretty strong case for being the best player in the country. So in that regard, yes I guess I do.
I feel like if you look at Manning's numbers and record versus some of the other QBs that have won it, it does seem like he got the shaft. It really doesn't matter, though. The award seems to have lost a lot of luster since then. Also, Peyton has done just fine, anyway.
From the 1997 season, I remember watching Michigan and Ohio State, and how my dad was screaming about how David Boston couldn't get open against Woodson, although Boston did eventually get one.