SlipKidVol
Whos_Next
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 2,582
- Likes
- 2,369
3 consecutive losing seasons and having to fire the head coach and start all over again is winning in your book, huh? Not mine. I was never sold on Dooley, but I would rather he had been successful. I don't care about being right, if it means the Vols have to lose.
Excuse or reason?
The excuse was those who tried to say "If Sal weren't hired....". Dooley hired him. Part of his job is to make the right hire and then to make things happen even if he doesn't.
Dooley did inherit a mess. Sometimes when you walk into something like that you drown before you can get your head out of the water. He did some things that should pay dividends for the program like re-building the foundation of the roster and the VFL program. But at some point you have to prove you can coach and win against the better coaches. Unfortunately, he could not do it.
If Jones wins... Dooley may become a popular coach for programs that are down. Give him two or 3 years and he will set the next guy up.
:thumbsup:What's your excuse for having the time, energy, and poor taste to start ANOTHER thread about how bad Dooley was? I expect that you're extraordinarily successful at your job, probably as a CEO or some other million dollar level professional, so you won't understand, but the man was offered a job, tried, didn't succeed at it, was fired, and now we're off in a completely new direction.
Petty and Pathetic Thread.
Exactly Sjt!!:good!: When I read the op this is the only thing I can think of. Even reading through all the posts. Glad someone else beat me to it. People frankly are just not capable of understanding the difference. They sit and make fun of a guy that would walk circles around them in a conversation about CFB. It's soooo easy to see who the losers are that need to find joy in the failures of others cause that's how pathetic they are.
Dooley was not over his head IMO...for the job he was hired for. Rebuild. W/Ls is not the way to judge his time here because down times can and will happen in complete rebuilds imo. It's all the other things he had to fix behind the scenes that were left for him by the ones before him. From rebuilding a roster to over seeing the construction of the new facilities.
Dooley's tenure and CBJs can not be compared equally by any means. 2 toooootallly different situations. Dooley took over a house that was condemned and now CBJ is just having to pick out the best drapes to go with the furniture.
You two are still making excuses for Dooley. He did not leave things in any better shape than he inherited.
Clearly should have retained that .750 coach who, in his last eight years-two graduating classes, managed to beat the big five in the SEC 12 times while losing to those five 22 times, not .750 of course, but merely .352, and who had a 29-21 overall record his last four years while going 17-15 in SEC play, not .750, but .531. Definitely a poor decision in retrospect.
Dooley was not over his head IMO...for the job he was hired for. Rebuild. W/Ls is not the way to judge his time here because down times can and will happen in complete rebuilds imo. It's all the other things he had to fix behind the scenes that were left for him by the ones before him. From rebuilding a roster to over seeing the construction of the new facilities.
Dooley's tenure and CBJs can not be compared equally by any means. 2 toooootallly different situations. Dooley took over a house that was condemned and now CBJ is just having to pick out the best drapes to go with the furniture.
I met Dooley too and I just cannot imagine this. The man was respectful and courteous.
If you truly believe this, then you need to get your head examined.
You should feel very blessed that Dooley accepted the job and that he did a swell job of rebuilding an absolute dumpster fire. His W/L record is not indicative of the rebuilding he did.
But I was big on saying we need to be patient no matter who the coach is. There is a segment of our fanbase, and not the intelligent part, but the opposite. And for the benefit of that part of the fanbase, let me make it clear that I mean the dumbass part. The dumbass part of the fanbase thought all we had to do was jettison Fulmer and we could instantly start going 11-1 or 12-0 and competing for the NC every year. Their logic in thinking this apparently consisted of saying that Urban Meyer did this at Florida and Saban did this at Alabama, while completely ignoring how unusual the success of both those coaches was and is.
So if we jettisoned Fulmer and got that dumbass Kiffin and then Dooley, the people most upset with Dooley are likely the same mouthbreathing cretins that assume firing Fulmer will lead to instant success.
Thus, those people need to have their faces rubbed in JUST HOW BAD it can be, and maybe learn to be a bit more patient. Or, better yet, get the hell out of the fanbase.
So I defended the team for a long time, not out of love of Dooley, but to counter the idiots in the fanbase who don't understand that a coaching change is fraught with risk. Wanna get rid of a coach that won the NC and is 0.750. Oopps! Didn't work! So now you wanna get rid of the current coach? Nope. Enjoy losing for awhile, and let it soak through your thick skull that you're a knuckle dragging moron, and should probably start rooting for Vandy or Bammer. In other words, enjoy the Dooley era! You thoroughly deserve it!
Yeah and every single one of those numbers is better than anything Dooley or Kiffin did.
And who says you can't have a couple bad years in a 16-year stretch?
But seriously...did we go 11-1?
As i have said before, it's every Tennessee fan's god given right to berate dooley for the length of time they are berated about the kentucky and vandy losses.
When Tennessee fans stop catching hell for that, then dooley can stop catching hell