Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

All I’m saying is this is all political theater. He’s not going to jail and he’s not in any real trouble.
Pretty much agree completely with your post though.
Jail? Probably not. It is not like we could exile him to Elba or Saint Helena (Napoleon) so the positioning of Trump is going to be interesting. Probably will be confined and limited if found guilty. Internet connection taken away? LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13

Typical Attack the Prosecutor rhetoric, this is just a tactic used by the opposing party to try to shift public opinion and is strictly political in nature. Casting doubt in the Case so they have to throw the kitchen sink. Who cares if he did do it and probably did do it. Has no affect on this case especially when Trump is adding to his own demise.

This is a scare tactic not a good defense and it is used because they are scared of what could/will happen. Aboutism and Deflection from the current case. Trump and Smith are both dirty, so what? Means nothing and will not change the outcome. Hopium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
Typical Attack the Prosecutor rhetoric, this is just a tactic used by the opposing party to try to shift public opinion and is strictly political in nature. Casting doubt in the Case so they have to throw the kitchen sink. Who cares if he did do it and probably did do it. Has no affect on this case especially when Trump is adding to his own demise.

This is a scare tactic not a good defense and it is used because they are scared of what could/will happen. Aboutism and Deflection from the current case. Trump and Smith are both dirty, so what? Means nothing and will not change the outcome. Hopium.

Well said.

Attacking the messenger because of the message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
People like me. LOL. Tell me what you know about me.
The only conclusion one could derive is that you may be a little insecure if you have to ask. In Reality you are on a msg board asking for an characterization/opinion of you based on your posts...you really should not care what others sum up. You are who you are...ain't about you
 
  • Like
Reactions: WBO
The only conclusion one could derive is that you may be a little insecure if you have to ask. In Reality you are on a msg board asking for an characterization/opinion of you based on your posts...you really should not care what others sum up. You are who you are...ain't about you
I didn't ask for a conclusion. But way to jump in there.
 
The DC establishment hating him is enough for me. And their hate is not driven by any moralistic cause either, which is spoken by many, but a joke as they are as or even more slimy. The only thing I can think of is the hate is actually fear of upsetting their power games as an outsider.

And before it is said what would those issues be..look at troops in Syria where they lied to the CiC, Miley backdooring in China, Kerry running to Iran. Now it is Ukraine. FP..ie CIA, seems to be the driver. I actually thought his FP was excellent.

If he were to slash budgets, they would have a conniption.

Good post. Looking back I wonder if the reason he had problems slashing budgets when the Republicans had both houses is due to people like McConnell. McConnell attempted to undermine a Republican House before they took the gavel after this last election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Good post. Looking back I wonder if the reason he had problems slashing budgets when the Republicans had both houses is due to people like McConnell. McConnell attempted to undermine a Republican House before they took the gavel after this last election.

Loving the Repub on Repub hate.
 
Well if history holds it will be a couple of presidents before the republicans retaliate.

At the rate things are going, if there are a couple more dem presidents before a republican president might win, then I don't think it will matter; the country will be too far gone to salvage anything.
 
Good post. Looking back I wonder if the reason he had problems slashing budgets when the Republicans had both houses is due to people like McConnell. McConnell attempted to undermine a Republican House before they took the gavel after this last election.
I think in his own mind McConnell was trying to hold the Party together and not walk to far out on a Trump Limb. Think about Graham as well. Three Supreme Court Judge Appointments in a short period of time is a win. McConnell and Graham were both holding the Party under Control without it going MAGA. When Trump went on his own horn is when McConnell pulled back and Graham would flip and flop around like a fish out of water. Cruz had his moments as well, but only 1.5 of them were thinking about the damage to the party.
 
Just keeping the pot stirred is enough. Supreme Court Appointments, Gun Restrictions, disappearing witnesses, LBGTxyz, CRT, Social Security, Medicare, and the lists goes on and on. They have accomplished more without full power than Biden has with it. It really boils down to Congress in the long run. So expect to live with this for a while and when the Democrats lose their grip on the system expect them to do the same.

Bottom Line: Until the extremes of both parties are eliminated, we cannot manage this country from the middle. So expect more of the same with The Republican Party splitting inside its own Party line which will cause more issues.

I don't know what you mean Nothing is going to happen to Trump, it already has happened to him and may get worse. He now has bags under his eyes and appears more desperate than ever. Trump is losing control. That is something that has happened to him.

That's true, but the side that caves first loses, and the left isn't giving up their crusades. In the end it's a continuing polarized political battle, a complete conservative/moderate surrender, or revolution. I'm beginning to lose patience and favor starting up the party to get it over with.
 
Loving the Repub on Repub hate.

Democracy (the ideology) is messy; totalitarianism (as practiced by the democratic party) results in solidarity. Seems that republicans are more ideologically democratic these days than democrats are. Personally, I'd like it a lot better if a bunch of "republicans" would ether go away or grow a spine and represent the people who elect them, and I think a lot of others feel the same way or Trump would never have become president.
 
Democracy (the ideology) is messy; totalitarianism (as practiced by the democratic party) results in solidarity. Seems that republicans are more ideologically democratic these days than democrats are. Personally, I'd like it a lot better if a bunch of "republicans" would ether go away or grow a spine and represent the people who elect them, and I think a lot of others feel the same way or Trump would never have become president.

Trump became President because the Dems nominated one of the worse people in modern politics. I'm a lib but she isn't. She, like many politicians, don't believe in anything other than themselves, but she takes it to a new level. I knew she was toast when she came up with the deplorables crap.

But Dems being unified? i think it was Will Rogers who said "I am not a member of an organized political party, I am a Democrat."
 
Trump became President because the Dems nominated one of the worse people in modern politics. I'm a lib but she isn't. She, like many politicians, don't believe in anything other than themselves, but she takes it to a new level. I knew she was toast when she came up with the deplorables crap.

But Dems being unified? i think it was Will Rogers who said "I am not a member of an organized political party, I am a Democrat."

You call yourself a Lib but decry Clinton calling MAGA "deplorables"? Ha, she hit the nail on the head, man.

Clinton is MASSIVELY smarter, more reputable and more qualified for high public office than the monomaniacal, vile gangster---and anyone who thinks differently needs a prescription for logic pills. MASSIVELY. She is genuinely qualified to be president while the gangster is massively qualified to be incarcerated. Gee, how to compare a woman who's spent most of her adult life in public service compared to a narcissistic con man and crook who doesn't respect American laws and American institutions. Tough one. Trump's win over Clinton will go down in history as the darkest days in American political history---period.
 
You call yourself a Lib but decry Clinton calling MAGA "deplorables"? Ha, she hit the nail on the head, man.

Clinton is MASSIVELY smarter, more reputable and more qualified for high public office than the monomaniacal, vile gangster---and anyone who thinks differently needs a prescription for logic pills. MASSIVELY. She is genuinely qualified to be president while the gangster is massively qualified to be incarcerated. Gee, how to compare a woman who's spent most of her adult life in public service compared to a narcissistic con man and crook who doesn't respect American laws and American institutions. Tough one. Trump's win over Clinton will go down in history as the darkest days in American political history---period.
Still crying over that huh? Are you sure you aren’t Luther? He still cries himself to sleep thinking about Trump beating Hillary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Trump became President because the Dems nominated one of the worse people in modern politics. I'm a lib but she isn't. She, like many politicians, don't believe in anything other than themselves, but she takes it to a new level. I knew she was toast when she came up with the deplorables crap.

But Dems being unified? i think it was Will Rogers who said "I am not a member of an organized political party, I am a Democrat."
Bingo. Most voted against her is what happened. It wasn't even that she was a she, it was she was Hillary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
Trump became President because the Dems nominated one of the worse people in modern politics. I'm a lib but she isn't. She, like many politicians, don't believe in anything other than themselves, but she takes it to a new level. I knew she was toast when she came up with the deplorables crap.

But Dems being unified? i think it was Will Rogers who said "I am not a member of an organized political party, I am a Democrat."

Today's dems aren't Will Rogers' dems. They may be all over the spectrum from left of center to far left, but they tend to stick together pretty well when dem solidarity is needed for a vote. Much better than you'd expect considering the diversity.
 
Today's dems aren't Will Rogers' dems. They may be all over the spectrum from left of center to far left, but they tend to stick together pretty well when dem solidarity is needed for a vote. Much better than you'd expect considering the diversity.

I want to say something like "It's because we're the party of ideas, not status quo."

But I know it's currently because of Trump. He crystallized Dem thought to one thing, beat him, the right wing and all the things they stand for.. Makes cohesiveness easy. Hope he doesn't drop out of campaign.
 

VN Store



Back
Top