Lexvol
I'm Your Huckleberry
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 22,284
- Likes
- 241
Is this the tongue speaking you are referring to?
Farting Preacher - FartingPreacher.org | The Orginal Robert Tilton Farting Preacher Video Clips
That is him.
Is this the tongue speaking you are referring to?
Farting Preacher - FartingPreacher.org | The Orginal Robert Tilton Farting Preacher Video Clips
For some reason they all disagree with me on Energy... so I see no need to waste tons of cash researching biofuels...
I'd much rather see that cash spent developing the nuclear power we are in dire need of, but what do I know.
I actually had a problem with the biofuels question as well - and it is an issue at the heart of science and technology policy. Sometimes, the words written into legislation are much to restrictive, and keep good ideas from being funded because of a lack of knowledge or a misunderstanding. An example is wording in recent legislation that mentioned funding studies for ethanol/ethane an lighter biofuel hydrocarbons. Well, it turns out some pretty cool stuff can be done with propane...there was no reason to specify "lighter" hydrocarbons..but they did and until that is changed, that can't be researched.
I would have preferred the alternative energy question to have been worded something like "increased funding for alternatives to fossil fuels and increased funding for carbon capture and sequestration and clean coal technologies"...something along those lines.