Glitch
Sally says I am funny! Maybe she will let me live!
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,153
- Likes
- 208,796
I understand why people think this but I would offer two points
The majority of commitments do stick and only commit and sign w one school
If you feel this way the recruiting forum seems like an odd place for you to reside
I understand why people think this but I would offer two points
The majority of commitments do stick and only commit and sign w one school
If you feel this way the recruiting forum seems like an odd place for you to reside
I don't get as excited as I used to nor as disappointed as I used to. I still love to follow recruiting, I just dont get bent out of shape over it anymore.My post mainly about the fact that commitment does not mean what it used to mean. I think it means "favorite right now" to a good many players. I try not to get too bent out of shape either way, as signing day is what matters most. I get excited when we get a big time commit, though, like the rest of us. It may have sounded cynical, but it is the nature of the times. Commitment does not mean commitment unless you add "right now" to it.
Well yeah you can at least he can be a silent. You can say "listen you have a lot of football ahead of you and we are going to be watching you and supporting you but commitments mean something so lets wait to till you are further along in your career to make that huge decision so we both know its the right one."
well with that well thought out argument...I guess I am wrong. Sorry all for having an opinion on here and discussing!
And then that kid says, "Hey coach, kick rocks. I'll take my talent to Gainesville."
In certain situations, schools are slaves to the kid, and vice-versa. You just have to hope he stays committed, knowing full well, there is a good chance he doesn't. Nature of the beast. Coaches understand that. Emotional fans have a harder time grasping it.
Well yeah you can at least he can be a silent. You can say "listen you have a lot of football ahead of you and we are going to be watching you and supporting you but commitments mean something so lets wait to till you are further along in your career to make that huge decision so we both know its the right one."
If he committed to a team like OSU, people would say, "Wow. They're already off to a great start to their '20 class." Why can't you just appreciate the positive now instead of inserting negative where none exists?
If he committed to a team like OSU, people would say, "Wow. They're already off to a great start to their '20 class." Why can't you just appreciate the positive now instead of inserting negative where none exists?
Exactly. Corbin committed to UT, decommitted a couple weeks later, and is now committed to another school. Kids view commitments like they view high school relationships. They often don't truly know what they are looking for and when something that looks good comes along, they grab it. Then they realize that maybe they like that other good looking thing over there and grab it instead. If the NCAA really wanted to stop the commit/decommit issue, they could make a rule that prospective student athletes are not permitted to verbally commit to any school until at minimum 12 months from their scheduled signing day with their prospective university. Then you would have any commits for the 19 football class until after the 18 class has their signing day.
It won't happen, but it is the only way to stop it. Schools are not going to stop taking early commitments, because it brings their schools name up in social media and when the kids go to camps and such.
The NCAA doesn't have the authority to keep a kid from committing. Those are just words and they can't control such words. All they can do is make the rule that a school can't offer before the senior year. Committing without an offer is silly, although players this good assume they'd get the offer when allowed.