Florida Reporter Amanda Woods-Will Grier bought PED's in JUNE!

#26
#26
I still think Florida will end up being rewarded instead of punished. Ain't nothing gon happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#28
#28
TrueOrange said:
Not how vacating a win works.
Click to expand...

Penn State won the Sugar Bowl over Oklahoma in January of 1973 1-0 when OU was punished for playing an ineligible player and I believe Ole Miss got three straight vacated wins over Miss State from 1975-1977 when Miss State had to vacate wins by the NCAA. I believe it has happened before
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#29
#29
TrueOrange said:
So where's the part where the University of Florida knew about his usage, covered for him, and knowingly played him anyways, or where the University of Florida paid for this supplement or provided it themselves to Grier?
Click to expand...

The kid was a stick a year ago. Gained 40 lbs in 12 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#31
#31
Catbone said:
I still think Florida will end up being rewarded instead of punished. Ain't nothing gon happen.
Click to expand...

Harris will be even better than Grier and some random 5* will commit to them because he felt bad about the way they got treated by the NCAA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#32
#32
UTK said:
This but isn't it a possibility they simply rule UF ineligible for the SEC championship game??
Click to expand...

That's not the way the NCAA operates. They'll make a ruling somewhere around 2019 making Florda vacate the championship if they happen to win it. Of course they can't stop the university or the fans from still claiming it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#34
#34
VolFootballnut said:
Penn State won the Sugar Bowl over Oklahoma in January of 1973 1-0 when OU was punished for playing an ineligible player and I believe Ole Miss got three straight vacated wins over Miss State from 1975-1977 when Miss State had to vacate wins by the NCAA. I believe it has happened before
Click to expand...

That's not right.

Mississippi State had to forfeit - not vacate - their 1976 and 1977 wins over Ole Miss (the Rebels won the 1975 matchup 13-7).

As far as the Dec. 1972 Sugar Bowl, Oklahoma had retroactively forfeit 9 games from that 11 game season, due to using two ineligible freshmen through the season. Penn State refused to accept a forfeit win, and as such the Penn State forfeit win over Oklahoma in the 1972 Sugar Bowl isn't recognized by anyone aside from a handful of fans...however the NCAA also has stated that forfeits were not part of the NCAA sanctions levied against the Sooners - only restrictions on scholarships, TV appearances, and bowl appearances (so this was a mess of one to bring up as an example). Either way, neither the schools nor the NCAA nor the press claims a 1972 1-0 Sugar Bowl victory.
 
#35
#35
TrueOrange said:
That's not right.

Mississippi State had to forfeit - not vacate - their 1976 and 1977 wins over Ole Miss (the Rebels won the 1975 matchup 13-7).

As far as the Dec. 1972 Sugar Bowl, Oklahoma had retroactively forfeit 9 games from that 11 game season, due to using two ineligible freshmen through the season. Penn State refused to accept a forfeit win, and as such the Penn State forfeit win over Oklahoma in the 1972 Sugar Bowl isn't recognized by anyone aside from a handful of fans...however the NCAA also has stated that forfeits were not part of the NCAA sanctions levied against the Sooners - only restrictions on scholarships, TV appearances, and bowl appearances (so this was a mess of one to bring up as an example). Either way, neither the schools nor the NCAA nor the press claims a 1972 1-0 Sugar Bowl victory.
Click to expand...

Thx for clearing that up:hi::good!:
 
#36
#36
WiseOlVol said:
The kid was a stick a year ago. Gained 40 lbs in 12 months.
Click to expand...

So he gained 3 pounds a month.

I'm not arguing that he didn't violate established rules.

But for a punishment to be doled out to the Florida team as a whole through either vacating or forfeiture of wins - like some people seem to be calling or hoping for - then it has to be much larger than just this. The violations have to actually extend up to the university itself - by its actively taking part in allowing and/or hiding such - for something like that.



We've also already seen from past cases that there's at least a week period between when when the first random mandatory test is done and when the University actually hears back from the NCAA about a positive test (not to mention nothing in the rules/policies retroactively changes any stats or results; the player is just suspended following the school's receiving the report from the NCAA of the positive test).
 
Last edited:
#39
#39
bowlinggreenvol said:
What's dicey? There's no doubt he was on them before yesterday but he wasn't tested until a week or two ago and became ineligible upon test results, which take 10-15 days to receive. He was suspended and done so immediately. Are you hoping for a vacated win for them/loss for us? We had a chance to earn it on the field and pissed it away as fast as Grier's season.
Click to expand...

Oh hush! Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
bowlinggreenvol said:
It's been posted that it doesn't work that way; they vacate we don't claim wins. And no I don't want to back into ATL that way. 2007 when they lost 3 and we lost 2, despite drubbing us is not backing in, like some claim. This would be. We should've beaten them easily.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't mind one bit.

If that is a NCAA ruling what are UF fans going to say? Grier cheated, bottom line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#46
#46
UTCVol said:
I hate it, but we didn't lose because of Grier. We lost because our secondary is literally that bad.
Click to expand...

bowlinggreenvol said:
But but if he hadn't been juicing he wouldn't have completed a 14 yard curl that the receiver took another 50 yards to the house
Click to expand...

Jax_Vol said:
Amanda Woods should win the Pulitzer prize for this outstanding piece of reporting
Click to expand...

Who knows how many of them are on PED's? Receivers? Freshman lineman?

How many was it that had FLU like symptoms?

https://www.google.com/search?sourc...0.0i22i30.0.0.0.21847...........0.WLaGgrC5690


Amanda may be on to Florida's worse nightmare.... Keep digging girl......................
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#48
#48
#49
#49
Anyone who has spent 2 seconds deadlifting knows that when a product starts yapping on about boosting Test there might be a good chance something ain't legit in it. Now for the layperson who cares, but when you are drug tested for PEDs..that's not just dumb, its Floridumb.
 
#50
#50
Florida only gets in trouble if they gave these to the kids or encouraged it. Doubtful.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top