What leads you to believe that Oklahoma isn’t a good team?
I posted this before watching the game as I had only listened to it.
Here’s how I see things.
Oklahoma’s defense is not just good, they are very good. Especially at the line. Our offense can say it has been tested, and exposed in one areaa—the OL. As I presumed preseason, the lack of depth and blue chip talent along the OL did and will pose issues against teams with stout, deep defensive lines. We got all we wanted from Oklahoma on that front (pun intended), but we also have to remember that’s a Venables product. We saw how much it hurt Clemson when he left. When he was there, they were among the best two teams in the nation 4 times I believe? And the best twice.
Their offense has been pretty bad. They put up low scores against the 117th SOS before playing us. So, while everyone is raving about our defense, I still believe they haven’t been tested. Albeit, you don’t have to go too far past the eye test to believe in them after what we just saw against a struggling Oklahoma offense. 11 TFLs and 2 sacks, 36 yards rushing, and 196 yards passing that would most likely have been less had we not played prevent defense the last couple of series speaks volumes about their abilities. Still their performance throughout first four games speak volumes about Oklahoma’s offense, because we didn’t put up those types of defensive numbers against UTC, NCST OR Kent St.
Again, I’m not saying our defense isn’t as good as many are saying, I am just saying they haven’t really been tested, because Oklahoma is indeed bad on offense.