Holy Crap folks...i've been splattered with so many statistics i don't know what the arguement was all about anymore.
here's one for you though
National Titles: Phil 1. Majors 0 Battle 0
Wins over Bama: Phil 9 Majors 2 or 3? Battle: ? but i know it wasn't 9.
In any event...Phil gets his chance to fix it. It's one year of really bad play. if we have one or two more years with little or no improvement, then get the moving truck, ok? but for now, give the man a chance, he has earned that.
Plus neither Majors or Battle had divisional play to worry about, and neither played the OOC competition we have under Fulmer.
and lest not forget...the conf. is a 6 team conf. now, back then it was a two or three team conf. every year...the in house competition has gotten much better...look at this:
LSU, TN, Bama and UF have all won NC's during Fulmer's era.
UGA, LSU, Aub, Bama, UF, UT have all won the conf. in Fulmer's era.
Every team in the in the conf. except Vandy, USC and KY have at least won, or tied for thier dvision in Fulmer's era.
If I remember correctly, and i could definitely be wrong...in the 80's for the SEC it was UGA early part, Aub and Bama later in the decade that dominated the SEC? UT won or tied a couple here and there as well. I also think Bama and UGA were the only teams win NC's in the 80s, that was pretty much dominated by OK, Miami...
It's a different animal these days folks...comparing us now and then don't work.