IPorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 25,545
- Likes
- 47
We went through the same thing on a global scale in the 19th century. The whaling industry provided the world with oil to light their homes but whales almost became extinct. This was a scary reality for all, but they didn't turn government to come up with an alternative. The market did out of necessity. When truly there is a real demand for alternative energy, the market will supply it. Right now we are content with oil.
Many whale species would be extinct today without government intervention.
The fantasy world of "government/capital is great for everything!" on this forum is strangely pervasive.
Like everybody would just switch over to something else? We're on course to ride that crude oil pony all the way into the sunset.
With the Honda FCX (hydrogen fuel car that I've been pimping hard) Honda has been working on a NG water heater that will double as a hydrogen pump.
Well, that's a tangent from the point I was making, but you don't need government to save the whales, man. All you need is ownership. Whale populations would thrive if we could own them as private property.
YouTube - Part 4: 5/8/09 John Stossel's "You Can't Even Talk About It"
if there's an alternative enough people will switch to make it work. However if you roll out a $50k electric car like it's going to save mankind then don't be surprised when it bombs
make it viable and people will buy it. Until then...
Being a whale rancher or even one of their cowpokes would be a pretty sweet gig. So to better take care of their food source, do someone need to own the oceans as well? Should they charge rent for all whales that aren't their's that feed on the plankton? Do they seek damages when a cruise ship dumps their raw sewage in their space? How would all of that work?
Those are good questions and it's untrodden ground so we've had no ability to experiment with this, but I'm willing to bet that building a whale farm on your own property along the coast (or some other similar solution) would be a lot more lucrative than poaching, no matter how much is required to prepare the whale farm.
Seems better than corn, but you'd still be using what would be agricultural space for energy purposes. Could be an issue. Also, the energy returns vs the costs of land degradation from harvesting, transportation of the crop and processing, and then distribution of the fuel makes it less efficient than fossil fuels, even if less polluting from a carbon point of view.
People keep mentioning the tidal generators. Have they even successfully done that anywhere yet?
Those are good questions and it's untrodden ground so we've had no ability to experiment with this, but I'm willing to bet that building a whale farm on your own property along the coast (or some other similar solution) would be a lot more lucrative than poaching, no matter how much is required to prepare the whale farm.
whales migrate over thousands of miles, they're not brook trout that can be raised in giant swimming pools on a couple acres of land
These libertarian things start breaking down when they try to privatize the entire natural world. It's too interconnected to work well like that.
I was unaware of this. Geese migrate and they are farmed. A little research showed that whales migrate primarily because of food and partly because of temperature. A farm takes care of the food problem. A location with fair climate year round takes care of the other problem.