Do you all think we will keep all these upcoming games? Some sound awesome, but man our schedule is already so hard with just our yearly SEC rivals.
What do you all think?
I get so sick of this "conference is hard enough as it is" argument. First of all lets look at the schedule last year. Florida and Georgia will generally be tough games. Scar is on the rise so that has been a tough game and of course we all know Vandy had their best season since reconstruction. Kentucky and Mizzou stunk, and State went 1-5 after playing us. So out of 8 conference games, 3 were easily winnable at UT's historic levels and Vandy should always be an assumed win. So that leaves 4 out of 12 games each year that you can expect to be difficult (Bama, Georgia, Florida, and SCAR). So is 4 games really too much to be difficult?
My preference would be to go to 9 conference games, that leaves you with room for 1 BCS opponent (Oregon, Notre Dame, etc), 1 regional matchup (I would like to play teams like Memphis, MTSU, WKU, and other 1-A paty's on a somewhat regular basis), and then one more that can be a big game or a UAB-type game.
Not only that, but for those who say the conference schedule is too hard, would you be complaining when the home schedule included just 4 conference games and 3 crappy games? Lets take last year. Homes games with Florida and Alabama are typically going to be good games. But then you play UK and Mizzou in conference (both crappers) and then Troy, Akron, and Georgia State? Yes, that is 7 home games but 3 of them are going to be played in front of 20,000 empty seats because the match up is boring.
I understand not playing 12 BCS-level opponents, but the argument that the conference is too difficult for OOC games, I don't buy it.