'17 GA ATH DeAngelo Gibbs

[drvenner]

yawn. Volnation sunshine pumper tactic #2.

Call any and all who have a different take other than "butch stones is the man . Butch knows recruiting!" a troll.
How about reality? Want some reality? Mark richt really wanted preston williams. We didn't get him and that sucked. His gf was the ace in the hole. Still wish we had him as he would be probably starting this year. Kyle davis? Same thing. Derrick brown? Same thing. Sometimes a kid wants to go elsewhere for a variety of reasons.

38-31. That's 22.58% more points for those of you keeping score at home.

 

[VolFreakJosh]

I think GA fans are some of the most delusional in the country, but this post is freaking spot on.

Bless your heart

 

[sanddune50]

So basically, a kid has a 66% better chance of making an NFL roster at DB by going to UGA rather than UT.

Sounds about right

60% of the time it works every time.

 

[UT_King]

Bless your heart

Thank you

 

[Nashvegas31]

It sounds like the Gibbs and the Reeds are going to have some immediate family members on academic scholarships at UGA who would otherwise be paying their way to take remedial courses at Athens Technical Community College.

Kirby learned from the best at these tactics. Too bad Dooley didn't pick up on that part unless Saban didn't do it until bama

 

[UTVolinExile]

Oh the irony.

If you seriously believe that a Dawg DB is 66% more likely to play in the NFL than a Vol DB, then you don't meet the admittedly low IQ requirements for posting here. GTFO.

If you already understood that your "point" was ridiculous, but you decided to make it anyway, then you're a troll. GTFO.

Either way...

 

[BowlBrother85]

Oh the irony.

There is no irony in that you were dead wrong with both your math and logic. Just like I said in a later post, in order to calculate a success rate for a team placing defensive backs in the NFL, you would need to know more than just the # of db's currently in the league. You would also need to know the # of db's that have come through each program and a frame of time would need to be established to arrive at the sample size. Now, I wouldn't expect a math major at UGA to comprehend this. Such basic principles of statistics are clearly over your head, so why not go back to Dawgvent where you can debate with like-minded folk of equally inferior intellect and education?

 

[DoubleDawg]

There is no irony in that you were dead wrong with both your math and logic. Just like I said in a later post, in order to calculate a success rate for a team placing defensive backs in the NFL, you would need to know more than just the # of db's currently in the league. You would also need to know the # of db's that have come through each program and a frame of time would need to be established to arrive at the sample size. Now, I wouldn't expect a math major at UGA to comprehend this. Such basic principles of statistics are clearly over your head, so why not go back to Dawgvent where you can debate with like-minded folk of equally inferior intellect and education?

This guy. LMAO. You and simple math don't get along! Another poster tossed out 5 Dawg dbs versus 3 Vols on NFL rosters. My "stat" was in reference to his argument that there are only 2 more Dawgs.

But the fact that you and that other guy can't divide 5 by 3 and get 166% is awesome.

 

[StoVol]

There is no irony in that you were dead wrong with both your math and logic. Just like I said in a later post, in order to calculate a success rate for a team placing defensive backs in the NFL, you would need to know more than just the # of db's currently in the league. You would also need to know the # of db's that have come through each program and a frame of time would need to be established to arrive at the sample size. Now, I wouldn't expect a math major at UGA to comprehend this. Such basic principles of statistics are clearly over your head, so why not go back to Dawgvent where you can debate with like-minded folk of equally inferior intellect and education?

They still count all the players who transferred to Louisville maybe?

 

[bUTchplease2]

This guy. LMAO. You and simple math don't get along! Another poster tossed out 5 Dawg dbs versus 3 Vols on NFL rosters. My "stat" was in reference to his argument that there are only 2 more Dawgs.

But the fact that you and that other guy can't divide 5 by 3 and get 166% is awesome.

How many times did you have to type that into the calculator to make sure it was right?

 

[Godfatha]

There's nothing worse than arrogant ignorance.

 

[FiremedicVOL127]

Geez guys stop arguing with this troll..... Let's take the high road like our players and just take care of the pups on the field and let them have there trash talk. We are VOLS...... Let's be classy


They're only talking crap rite now cause they know what's bout to happen in the east!!!!

 

[BowlBrother85]

This guy. LMAO. You and simple math don't get along! Another poster tossed out 5 Dawg dbs versus 3 Vols on NFL rosters. My "stat" was in reference to his argument that there are only 2 more Dawgs.

But the fact that you and that other guy can't divide 5 by 3 and get 166% is awesome.

That doesn't tell you anything about the success rate of defensive backs making the NFL from the respective programs, DoubleDouche. Your statement was that a Georgia db had "66% better chance of making the NFL" which is not supported at all by dividing one number by the other. This is Stats 101.

 

[sanddune50]

This guy. LMAO. You and simple math don't get along! Another poster tossed out 5 Dawg dbs versus 3 Vols on NFL rosters. My "stat" was in reference to his argument that there are only 2 more Dawgs.

But the fact that you and that other guy can't divide 5 by 3 and get 166% is awesome.

 

[OGbabyaviVol]

This guy. LMAO. You and simple math don't get along! Another poster tossed out 5 Dawg dbs versus 3 Vols on NFL rosters. My "stat" was in reference to his argument that there are only 2 more Dawgs.

But the fact that you and that other guy can't divide 5 by 3 and get 166% is awesome.

Gold Jerry! Gold!

 

[Godfatha]

Put simply, let's say each school has 10 DBs.

Georgia has 5 in the league or 50% of their 10.

UT has 3 in the league or 30% of their 10.

That means UGA players have a 20% greater chance of making it to the league, not 66%.

Just using hypothetical numbers to prove the fallacy of your logic.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Put simply, let's say each school has 10 DBs.

Georgia has 5 in the league or 50% of their 10.

UT has 3 in the league or 30% of their 10.

That means UGA players have a 20% greater chance of making it to the league, not 66%.

Just using hypothetical numbers to prove the fallacy of your logic.

Yes and thank you.. Clearly, Godfatha is a graduate of the University of Tennessee College of Business. :hi:

 

[jlindsa4]

So basically, a kid has a 66% better chance of making an NFL roster at DB by going to UGA rather than UT.

Sounds about right

5/10 uga goes to the nfl
3/10 utk goes to the nfl

There are 66% more dbs from uga going to the nfl.
If a player is choosing a college, there is a 20% higher chance that he goes if he chooses uga.

The problem was context. Uga guy thinks the hypothetical was based on who has more and how much more. Utk guy was basing his hypothetical off of chances going to the nfl. Misunderstanding.

 

[sanddune50]

Put simply, let's say each school has 10 DBs.

Georgia has 5 in the league or 50% of their 10.

UT has 3 in the league or 30% of their 10.

That means UGA players have a 20% greater chance of making it to the league, not 66%.

Just using hypothetical numbers to prove the fallacy of your logic.

Looks like DoubleDawg missed his remedial math class.

 

[jlindsa4]

Undergrads like to fight.

 

[orangemadam]

Any news on DeAngelo?? Wrong thread?

 

[sanddune50]

5/10 uga goes to the nfl
3/10 utk goes to the nfl

There are 66% more dbs from uga going to the nfl.
If a player is choosing a college, there is a 20% higher chance that he goes if he chooses uga.

The problem was context. Uga guy thinks the hypothetical was based on who has more and how much more. Utk guy was basing his hypothetical off of chances going to the nfl. Misunderstanding.

Even with his gumpian version he still didn't understand the concept of percentages. 3 is 60% of 5. So technically it would be 40% more DBs from UGA in the NFL as opposed to Tennessee. 100%-60%=40%. Bottom line, hopefully someone is managing his money for him.

 

[BowlBrother85]

5/10 uga goes to the nfl
3/10 utk goes to the nfl

There are 66% more dbs from uga going to the nfl.
If a player is choosing a college, there is a 20% higher chance that he goes if he chooses uga.

The problem was context. Uga guy thinks the hypothetical was based on who has more and how much more. Utk guy was basing his hypothetical off of chances going to the nfl. Misunderstanding.

Except that is not what he said. He used the words "better chance" and applied a rate of percentage to it.

 

[DoubleDawg]

Looks like DoubleDawg missed his remedial math class.

I'm seriously stunned that there are that many of you that don't understand probability. Lol
Change your total population to 100 NFL Dbs. So now 5% are Dawgs and 3% are Vols. So you are 2% more likely to make an NFL roster right? Nope. Regardless of the n / total population, it's 66% more likely. 50% vs 30%, 5% vs 3%. Still 66% greater chance. Probability is a comparative stat.
It's seriously laughable how many of y'all don't get it.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Even with his gumpian version he still didn't understand the concept of percentages. 3 is 60% of 5. So technically it would be 40% more DBs from UGA in the NFL as opposed to Tennessee. 100%-60%=40%. Bottom line, hopefully someone is managing his money for him.

Leave it to the CPA!